Commentary

Marin Perez
 

Android Users Can Look Rich, Too

Remember that $1,000 iPhone App "I Am Rich?" The app showed a glowing red jewel, and ... well, that's about it. The point was that you could afford it and show it off. Now Android users can have that same kind of fun, and you'll also be able to get a recession-friendly discount as well.

Remember that $1,000 iPhone App "I Am Rich?" The app showed a glowing red jewel, and ... well, that's about it. The point was that you could afford it and show it off. Now Android users can have that same kind of fun, and you'll also be able to get a recession-friendly discount as well.The Android version changes its name to "I Am Richer," despite the fact it only costs $200, which is the maximum price a developer can charge in the Android Market. It changes the jewel to blue, because I guess blue diamonds show off your wealth more than red ones. Other than that, the app won't do much besides make your wallet lighter.

What's interesting about this app is that it should be a good example of how Google will handle its application store compared with Apple. The iPhone version found eight suckers to pay the $1,000 price tag, but Apple quickly yanked the app for no discernable reason. More than likely, they weren't appreciating the bad press the mobile program was getting.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Google said it will be keeping its mitts off applications in the Android Market unless there's malware, or something equally nefarious. I tend to like this a lot more than Apple's stance because it treats users with a higher level of respect and trust. It treats the Android platform like it would a personal PC: users can choose what to install and buy for their system. While I understand there are certain considerations that must be accounted for with the mobile space, I think Google has the right approach.

(Thanks for the photo, Gizmodo)


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links