Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

How Much Work Should Washington Put Into Social Media?

The General Services Administration has put out a request for a research firm to look into how the public views Facebook, YouTube, and other social media. How much do Americans want the government to communicate with them through social media versus other channels?

The General Services Administration has put out a request for a research firm to look into how the public views Facebook, YouTube, and other social media. How much do Americans want the government to communicate with them through social media versus other channels?According to an announcement on FedBizOpps.gov, the GSA is looking for a company to do a $2.5 million online market research survey to measure citizen communication channel preferences, determine how much citizens trust the government with privacy and security issues, and find out whether citizens think that social media could enhance government services. Proposals are due by Feb. 26. The GSA also wants to know if Web services could be improved in conjunction with phone, e-mail, printed material, emerging technologies, and other channels.

It's a great question. Facebook, YouTube, and other social media have had a powerfully transformative effect on communications -- for people who use them. Social media will likely get even more powerful over time, eventually becoming as mainstream as e-mail and the Web are today. But they're still emerging technologies -- how important are they today? And how much resources should the federal government give to social media, given everything else it has to deal with -- the banking crisis, mortgage meltdown, rising unemployment, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and all the normal issues of running government for the most powerful nation in the world?


More Government Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

(Via Federal Computer Week.)


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links