Commentary

Ed Hansberry
 

Is Window Mobile On Its Last Legs?

Fabrizio Capobianco, CEO of the mobile open source company Funambol, has all but declared Windows Mobile dead in a recent blog entry. Is he right, or is there still life left in the mobile platform from Microsoft?
Fabrizio Capobianco, CEO of the mobile open source company Funambol, has all but declared Windows Mobile dead in a recent blog entry. Is he right, or is there still life left in the mobile platform from Microsoft?Mr. Capobianco claims that Motorola is abandoning the platform and this is the last blow for Microsoft. This may have come from earlier reports where it had been reported that Motorola was abandoning Windows Mobile in favor of Google's Android platform. Those rumors have been refuted by Brian Viscount, Motorola's VP of marketing for mobile enterprise computing, saying that the Enterprise Mobility business "remains 100% committed to Windows Mobile." Sure, Motorola may only be hiring in the Android area right now, but that simply means it's not understaffed in Windows Mobile development. Things aren't all rosy, though, as it also says that the Windows Mobile platform isn't growing at Motorola, and that is a problem given the mobile market is one of the few growth areas in this economy. Motorola is a valuable partner for Microsoft. Its popular Motorola Q is one of the top 10 best selling Windows Mobile phones ever. However, HTC is the big gorilla in Windows Mobile hardware development and sales. HTC makes and sells Windows Mobile devices under its own name, as well as making devices for Palm and most of the carriers around the world. If you have a Windows Mobile phone on you right now, there is a very good chance it was manufactured by HTC. Eric Zeman pointed out just over a week ago that Microsoft sold 20 million smartphones in 2008, a number over four times that of the iPhone platform and likely ahead of Nokia, though it's difficult to say with certainty as Nokia doesn't break its devices out in a way that is easy to do a direct comparison. There is no question Windows Mobile has lost some of the user enthusiasm it had just a few years ago. Since Windows Mobile 5 was released in 2005, each subsequent version has been perceived by many as a minor upgrade. Apple hasn't helped matters as it smacked one right out of the park with the iPhone in 2007, complete with a browser that makes Internet Explorer on a Windows Mobile device look completely inadequate. Microsoft has great strengths in the enterprise market, and those in IT that like the integration Windows Mobile has with Exchange and Windows networks aren't easily swayed by the latest features another platform has. Consumers are a different story, and for them, Windows Mobile may be looking a bit tired. Microsoft will be at Mobile World Congress in mid-February and it needs to make some announcements that will bring back some pizazz to the platform. No, Mr. Capobianco, Windows Mobile hasn't suffered its "last blow" by any stretch of the imagination. I think some of this is wishful thinking as revealed in near the bottom of the post. "...it might be open sourcing Windows Mobile. That would be so cool." At the same time, momentum has been going the wrong way for the platform recently and Microsoft needs to turn that around.

[Correction: The original article incorrectly stated Brian Viscount was speaking for the handset division. He was in fact speaking for Motorola's Enterprise Mobility business. The article has been changed to reflect that. The author regrets the error.]


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links