Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Microsoft Wins 'Vista Capable' Round One

If the "Vista Capable" lawsuit can be described as a boxing match, it's clear that Microsoft has won the latest round on points. True, the company failed to win an outright dismissal of the case, but they dodged the possibility of a class-action suit. That's a big win.

If the "Vista Capable" lawsuit can be described as a boxing match, it's clear that Microsoft has won the latest round on points. True, the company failed to win an outright dismissal of the case, but they dodged the possibility of a class-action suit. That's a big win.Lawyers love class-action lawsuits. By aggregating lots of plantiffs, law firms often can make tens of millions of dollars off a single class-action lawsuit. Consumers, on the other hand, are lucky to score a voucher of some kind that's good for a discount on a future purchase, or -- if they're really lucky -- a real check for perhaps $25.

One of the interesting points of this round: the judge said the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that the "Vista Capable" program increased sales of Windows Vista. If that program wasn't a common reason for consumers to purchase Vista, then it didn't justify class-action status. I have to agree with the judge here. In an earlier blog entry, I questioned the number of people who could really claim damages.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

So how many people did buy an XP-based system labeled "Vista Capable" and later found their coveted Vista upgrade wouldn't provide all the Vista features because of hardware deficiencies? At the moment, there are only six people who filed these suits. That's a number I can believe; maybe it's 10 or perhaps 100 times bigger than that, but I doubt it's in the thousands. The judge is allowing the six plaintiffs to continue with their individual cases, so there are at least a few more rounds to go in this slow-motion Microsoft-Intel PR disaster.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links