Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

The TomTom Dispute: No Bang

Kinda saw this one coming. TomTom and Microsoft have settled their whole dispute out of court -- leaving, as various pundits have observed, the whole MS-vs.-Linux issue still in legal limbo. That is, if there even is such an issue.

Kinda saw this one coming. TomTom and Microsoft have settled their whole dispute out of court -- leaving, as various pundits have observed, the whole MS-vs.-Linux issue still in legal limbo. That is, if there even is such an issue.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I'm going to stick my neck out and make an assertion: If at this point in time, with all that has happened both inside and outside Microsoft, Big Redmond still thinks it's a good idea to attack Linux-in-the-abstract ... sorry, no. I don't see it. Simply put, it makes no sense.

Most anyone could point to how Microsoft has been making steps towards the open source crowd -- and then point to just as many things that show they're either being two-faced or only able to commit themselves so much to the ideal of openness. But even with that level of ambivalence on their part, there's just that much less reason with every passing month for them to attempt that kind of political suicide.

The whole business with TomTom only seems to have involved Linux peripherally, anyway -- not something that formed a major part of their dispute with the company. (Is it really that tempting to see any lawsuit with the word "Linux" in it as an attack on Linux per se? Frankly, that sounds less like being vigilant about Linux and more like spoiling for a fight.)

The only way I can see a remotely fair chance that Microsoft (or anyone, really) could go to the mat with Linux and win is if something extremely unlikely, bordering on the impossible, takes place: if the copyrights and ownership for Linux pass out of the hands of Linus and into an organization or trust that assumes stewardship over it. That would make Linux into something centralized, and thus make it possible to mount that much more of a direct attack on it. Most anyone reading this is probably already laughing in disbelief at such a possibility, so there you go.

The major legal battles to be fought over Linux -- and open source generally -- are going to be of a different flavor. Example: legal enforcement of the GPL and similar licenses, which so far has been handled in the same manner as the TomTom incident (settling out of court), and may still be an open question.


Learn more about all the latest products and technologies at TechWeb's Interop Las Vegas, May 17-21. Join us (registration required).


Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links