Commentary

Chris Murphy
Editor, InformationWeek  

Twittering Our Way To ... Where?

Socialtext is coming out with a Twitter-like tool for internal company use, prompting TechCrunch's Erick Schonfeld to dub this "the year of the activity stream." There's a risk for companies here that CIOs can help manage: too much focus on process, not enough on the result.

Socialtext is coming out with a Twitter-like tool for internal company use, prompting TechCrunch's Erick Schonfeld to dub this "the year of the activity stream." There's a risk for companies here that CIOs can help manage: too much focus on process, not enough on the result.The risk comes when collaboration becomes a job requirement itself, rather than job requirements dictating the extent of collaboration. An "activity stream" like Signals and others could be wildly helpful to our colleagues. Or it could be a crutch to assure us that we're all very busy.

Nicholas Carr's writing on how the Web is changing how we think is a must-read for CIOs thinking about how enterprise 2.0 tools like Signals will affect the workforce. In a recently posted interview, Carr credits the real power and efficiency of interactive media, but also warns against discounting other activities -- immersion in a great novel or movie or piece of music -- as "passive" and therefore less valuable. He's talking about more personal pursuits, but I find this concern very relevant to the workplace. Says Carr:


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

"… The danger with interactive media is that they draw us away from quieter and lonelier pursuits. Interactivity is compelling because its rewards are so easy and immediate, but they're often also superficial."

A lot of valuable work people do is quiet or lonely and anything but easy. The gift of some of the most productive people I know is the ability to do one thing very well, letting nothing distract them from that focus. I wish I were one of these people and hadn't stopped to answer 17 e-mails and read 48 others (I just counted) during the course of writing this post.

This doesn't mean something like Signals is a bad idea inside a company. If it lets that superproducer give a terse, results-oriented update -- Project done. Deal closed. -- even more efficiently, it could be a perfect tool. Socialtext founder Ross Mayfield says that part of the power is integrating messaging into its collaboration platform. TechCrunch's Schonfeld posts a helpful image of Signals in a post that notes:

Signals and the desktop app should go far towards increasing employee interaction with the service. Each update serves as a prompt to follow up on a project or keep it moving along, while Signals can also serve as the new watercooler.

Twitter co-founder Evan Williams gives a business technology exec more to chew on (here's the video) in a recent interview with Charlie Rose, where he suggests that in five years, people will be as comfortable with Twitter as they are with blogging and social networks:

People in general are learning that living a bit more publicly, a bit more transparently, can have actually really powerful positive effects. You meet people, you are provided with new opportunities, you have the ability to express yourself and what's going on. And it can be narcissistic and completely ego driven, but it also can be just an authentic, open way to live your life that people enjoy and that makes everyone richer.

CIOs need to lead the discussion here, to be seen as the guide to using enterprise 2.0 tools like this. Getting collaboration right -- among co-workers, with business partners, with customers -- will be an increasingly important part of a company's competitive advantage. Deciding whether to bring a tool such as Signals in is a small step. Shaping the culture around how it's used will be the much bigger factor in whether it delivers or drains productivity.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links