The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Why Not WiMax And LTE On The Same Phone?


Posted by Michael Hickins, Mar 9, 2009 07:38 PM

The only winner in the standards battle between Long Term Evolution (LTE) and WiMax should be the consumer.


Sprint and Clearwire have done a great job of promoting WiMax, which has a big head start in terms of deployments and has produced a road map for deployments in 2009.

In contrast, the first U.S. deployments of LTE aren't scheduled until 2010 at the earliest.

But LTE nevertheless has the more serious momentum in the race for fourth-generation wireless networks among both carriers and handset makers.

Nokia certainly got the market's attention when it qualified WiMax as a mere niche technology, while Verizon's decision to go with LTE was particularly telling since that route represents a much more expensive, rip-and-replace approach than WiMax would have been.

But WiMax certainly will have its place, particularly in metropolitan areas, and this made me wonder why handsets couldn't accommodate both.

For decades, users have had to deal with diverging standards in electricity (power converters adding many pounds to luggage bound from Kennedy to Charles de Gaulle), second-generation cell phones (GSM versus CDMA) and television, (PAL, SECAM, NTSC).

Those should be yesterday's problems.

I asked Mike Jude, senior analyst with Current Analysis, why cell phones couldn't conceivably accommodate both WiMax and LTE, and he confirmed there's no reason that shouldn't happen.

"Multistandard componentry is becoming more and more common," he agreed. "A chipset should be able to discriminate between different carrier standards."

But Jude also noted that, while the verdict is still out in the LTE-WiMax battle, "the carriers generally have looked at the landscape and concluded the momentum is with LTE."

At the very least, he said, for WiMax to be successful, "it will need a hand-off capability to other 3G/4G networks."

As for Ultra Mobile Broadband, "it's not even going to be a player" since Qualcomm, its lead sponsor, abandoned it in favor of LTE, he said.

« Do Breach Notification Laws Work? Yes | Main | Google Makes Nice, Lets Devs Get Paid Apps, Updates Android Dev Phone 1 »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Digital Life Video

 

  1. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  2. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library
  3. Speeding Up Code Without Doing Anything


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  2. Repurposing Quack Science
  3. Specs For Next Motorola Android Phone Leak
  4. Motorola Promises Fix For Droid's Goofy Camera


  1. Cisco Rolls Out iPhone Security App
  2. Review: Bluetooth Headsets For Mobile Pros
  3. Wolfe's Den: Intel CTO Envisions On-Chip Data Centers
  4. So Much Data, So Little Encryption
  5. Lessons Learned From PCI Compliance
  6. Practical Analysis: How Locked In To Vendors Are You?

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007