Email
Print
Share5 States + Feds Still Wasting Time Over RFID Paranoia
Posted by Bob Evans on Apr 8, 2009 08:06 PM
Five states plus the federal government are looking to regulate the use of RFID due to misplaced fears of obliterated privacy. In a world jammed with surveillance cameras, cellphone-cameras, and imminent smart-grid brains that will scold you for using more electricity than some bureaucrat thinks you should, this paranoia over RFID goes beyond silly to absurd.
Not surprisingly, the federal government has insinuated itself into the act, and get a load out of the brainstorm they've come up with, according to a story in Supply Chain Digest:
Washington has been considering legislation for the past couple of years, and at one point the proposed law would have required that a person give explicit consent before he or she or what they are buying was read [by an RFID system]. The bill has since been watered down so that retailers or government agencies are permitted to read the tags or government agencies are permitted to read the tags they issue or directly or indirectly place on items, but not tags issued by others.
Wow – do you feel better already? So the federal legislation will allow retailers to read RFID tags that they have put on items – now there's a productivity enhancement we can all look forward to!
The Supply Chain Digest article goes on to cite what it calls legitimate privacy concerns, using this example: "Could a thief use a reader outside your home, and one day know there is a recently purchased laptop inside?" (I swear I am not making this up.) Well, yes, I guess a thief could do just that – and the other thing that high-tech thief could do is cruise the neighborhood on garbage night and see who's put a big new PC packing box out by the curb.
Now, I'll admit that most 21st-century criminals would probably prefer to take the simple approach and stand outside your home each night for three years waving an RFID reader at your house until one day you happen to buy a new computer, so thank goodness privacy nannies and our valiant legislators are protecting us from such threats. As the philospher Charlie Brown once said, "Good grief."
Sounding one note of common sense, the article says that a report from investment firm RW Baird offers the following hope: "Baird observes that whether it's RFID or any of these other technolgoes or databases, 'each has the opportunity to invade privacy, [and] legislation is better served protecting the associated data and penalizing misuse of that data. We hope sensible debate begins to form around this critical issue, not around regulating a particular technology.' "
Yes, and I hope my home state does not join New York, New Hampshire, Nevada, Massachusetts, and Washington state in pursuing this goofy solution that's desperately trying to pair up with a problem.
This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.
Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.
Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.