Commentary
The Dead Star Blues
Open most any tech-related publication and headlines smack you in the face about the imminent demise of Sun. Or the reasons why Sun has failed. Or what could be done to save Sun. In short, it's what most decently clued-in people have been talking about for years now. So why not just let Sun die?
Open most any tech-related publication and headlines smack you in the face about the imminent demise of Sun. Or the reasons why Sun has failed. Or what could be done to save Sun. In short, it's what most decently clued-in people have been talking about for years now. So why not just let Sun die?
More Software Insights
White Papers
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Outsourcing Security: What Every Potential Cloud Security Customer Should Know
It's a tempting proposition, especially since all of Sun's most important technology is now available under open source licenses of one kind or another. If Sun dies off, all of their best and brightest innovations -- Solaris, Java, OpenOffice, you name it -- will go on to find other and maybe even better patrons. Leave the dying to die, and move on to better things.
Well, maybe not.
What worries me is not Sun as a company, but Sun as a place where bunches of people are working together to make these things. If Sun itself vanishes, the engineering teams and programming crews that Sun put together are also destroyed, and may not be easily recreated. They're at least as important as any one product that Sun has created, and they cannot be replaced by simply shuffling around deck chairs.
I've mentioned this before, many times, but I want to hit on it as hard as I can right now. If buying Sun outright isn't a possibility, then perhaps other people can explicitly create the kinds of environments that will be natural extensions of Sun's existing teams. Keep the people, but scrape off the label and the serial numbers. (Obviously they won't be able to take anything with them that's Sun property.)
Sun's mistake was not that they went open source, but that they came into the game way too late; they should have started doing what they're doing now a decade ago or more. There's no way they can get caught up this fast. The only way forward I see for them is a graceful exit strategy that lets the people who did the real work go forth and multiply, so to speak.
Learn more about all the latest products and technologies at TechWeb's Interop Las Vegas, May 17-21. Join us (registration required).
Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Featured Broadcast
This white paper explains how to create a manageable, scalable environment suited to answer real-time business needs by building out a data center on a standards-based, virtualization-aware, energy-efficient and affordable platform. Plus, learn how virtualization is making the jump from the server realm into the application, mobile and database worlds in the additional resources section.
Learn More












