Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Air Force Calls In Twitter Air Strike

When the Air Force wanted to refute reports that GPS technology is failing, the service turned to Twitter to get the word out. Government Q&As on Twitter have been going on for a few months; it looks like they've gone beyond the gimmicky roots and are emerging as useful communications tools.

When the Air Force wanted to refute reports that GPS technology is failing, the service turned to Twitter to get the word out. Government Q&As on Twitter have been going on for a few months; it looks like they've gone beyond the gimmicky roots and are emerging as useful communications tools.The U.S. Government Accountability Office reported that the Air Force's system of GPS satellites is on the verge of failure, and the Air Force isn't moving fast enough to fix the problem. GPS needs a certain, minimum number of satellites in the sky to triangulate users' positions, and the Air Force isn't replacing the satellite fast enough.

If true, this would be a crisis of major proportions to me. I've become increasingly reliant on GPS, and would be incapable of navigating from my front door to the foot of my driveway without my trusty Garmin nÜvi.


More Government Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The Air Force disagrees with the GAO's dire assessment. In the past, in a disagreement of this type, the Air Force would have gone to journalists to get its side of the story out, holding a press conference, issuing a press release, or simply making a few phone calls.

This time, the Air Force decided to take its story directly to the people, via Twitter.

The sky isn't falling and neither is the Global Positioning System, the U.S. Air Force said during a Twitter news conference. "No, the GPS will not go down," tweeted Col. Dave Buckman of the Air Force's Space Command. "GAO points out, there is potential risk associated with a degradation in GPS performance."

GPS requires 24 satellites to keep up performance. The service has more than 30 satellites now, with one more going up in August and another early next year. "Going below 24 won't happen," the agency said.

Politicians and government agencies have been using Twitter to get the word directly to the people for a couple of months now. Israel hosted a Twitter Q&A on the Gaza conflict in January. In March, ABC News Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos interviewed Sen. John McCain on Twitter for 15 minutes. The Centers for Disease Control is using Twitter to get the word out about swine flu.

At the time of the McCain interview, I thought the use of Twitter was a gimmick, but now it's starting to look like a real communications channel. It's tough to get a nuanced idea across in a 140-character message, but the service's ubiquity and ease of use makes up for its other shortcomings. It's easy to use Twitter to send a message, and easy for people to find that message.

Social media allows government to take its message directly to the people, bypassing journalists. Much of journalism has always consisted of "he said she said" reporting. The journalist goes to a government official to get a statement, dutifully transcribes it, runs to an opponent to get an opposing statement, and then brings both those statements to the readers. Social media helps put he-said-she-said journalists out of a job, because the government official -- and his opponent -- can get their message directly to the people themselves. That means journalists need to concentrate on going beyond the public record and provide analysis and investigation.

InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on the business uses of social networks. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow InformationWeek on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and FriendFeed:

Twitter: @InformationWeek @MitchWagner

Facebook: InformationWeek Mitch Wagner

LinkedIn: InformationWeek Mitch Wagner

FriendFeed: InformationWeek Mitch Wagner


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links