Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

The 1% Solution

Word's been flying around all weekend about Linux finally breaking 1% consumer market share, up from 0.8% as of June last year. Red herring or milestone?

Word's been flying around all weekend about Linux finally breaking 1% consumer market share, up from 0.8% as of June last year. Red herring or milestone?


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I try to be skeptical about what claims like this mean, and for Linux's own sake. For one, it doesn't actually correlate to end-user desktops running Linux: it simply means that number of Internet client machines tabulated in the above poll reported themselves as running Linux. The breakdown reflects Windows and Mac marketshare, as you might expect -- but also iPhone and iPod Touch (interesting that Apple gets three separate breakouts), Java ME, and the all-inclusive "other".

What's paradoxical and funny is that tabulating by web client reportage may actually be more accurate over time, not less, as more people turn to the web to do everything from get their mail to perform word processing to update Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and (insert name of social networking site here). At some point I'm sure there will be a saturation level: what percentage of people need more than the absolute basics that, say, a netbook or smartphone can provide?

Thing is, I don't know that there's any way to anticipate what such usage will actually shape up to be until we're there. Right along with the "Linux at 1%" buzz is the "Netbooks may be a bubble" buzz -- speculation that once the economy picks up again, netbooks will be declassé. That, I reject: I don't know anyone who would turn down a decently-powered computer that has Internet connectivity and only runs about $250; even in good times, there are always people looking to save money, or just only buy what they need.

The whole question of Linux market penetration, the more I think about it, is really another question in disguise: the bigger question of Linux's validation in the public eye. If it's good enough for the other guy, then it's good enough for me, too -- or so goes the psychology for this sort of thing as so capably put by Alan Kay. The bigger the validation, the more people using it, the more feedback, the more contribution, etc., etc.

But the variety of validation and feedback you get from the guy on the street is completely different from what you get in the largely insular environments that Linux has thrived in. If Linux does start going from 1% to 2%, 5% and beyond, then people "on the inside" had better be prepared for what comes next.


Download the entire InformationWeek "green" issue, our May 4 magazine distributed solely in PDF form (registration required). We will plant a tree for each of the first 5,000 downloads.


Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links