Commentary
An iPhone Ban Is Not A Product Plan
So, Microsoft has decided that it will no longer pay for mobile devices that have non-Microsoft operating systems. That includes not only the iPhone, but others like the BlackBerry and Palm Pre as well. Android phones are right out, too.So, Microsoft has decided that it will no longer pay for mobile devices that have non-Microsoft operating systems. That includes not only the iPhone, but others like the BlackBerry and Palm Pre as well. Android phones are right out, too.Microsoft says this is part of the company's cost-cutting measures, but it seems that there's more to it than that. Unless, of course, they figure that employees would rather pay for their own decent phones than use a Windows Mobile one. Hmm, maybe this is a logical cost-cutting measure.
Some people might argue that this is simply a case of Microsoft "eating their own dog food" by using the products that the company makes. However, dogfooding is best defined by the case where the people who make the product are actually using the product. This policy, which seems to be "all Microsoft dogs, cats, parakeets, and gerbils will eat dog food," has the potential to cause collateral business damage.
More Windows Insights
White Papers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Five Jobs You Can Do Better with Intelligent Decision Automation
Of course the Windows Mobile group should be using their own product, because that will give them the experience to know what needs to be changed. But Microsoft is a big company; many other groups at Microsoft will no longer have the best tools to do their jobs, because Microsoft doesn't make the best tool in this case. In any case, it wouldn't hurt to have employees using competing products, especially if they shared their experiences and reasons for preferring an iPhone, BlackBerry, or Palm Pre to a Windows Mobile device. Think of the money they'll save by using employees instead of holding focus groups.
The problem isn't that employees want iPhones, but that employees think they can get more work done with their iPhone than with Windows Mobile. That is not the fault of the employees in other Microsoft divisions. Instead of giving employees substandard tools in the form of the mediocre Windows Mobile product, Microsoft should take this as an honest but brutal assesment of Microsoft's mobile computing platform and strive to do better.
At least we have a new benchmark for Windows Mobile. The product will be successful when Microsoft no longer has to force its employees to use it.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
This technical brief dives deep into migration recommendations and explains how to plan thoroughly, adopt a phased approach and who to ask for help.
Read Now












