Commentary
Candidate Obama Beat President Obama At Web 2.0
When Barack Obama was running for President, he made aggressive use of Web 2.0 and social media, but as president he's been more cautious. Why? The Center for American Progress, a liberal policy and advocacy group, has the answer: It's a lot harder for a sitting president to use social media than it is for a candidate.When Barack Obama was running for President, he made aggressive use of Web 2.0 and social media, but as president he's been more cautious. Why? The Center for American Progress, a liberal policy and advocacy group, has the answer: It's a lot harder for a sitting president to use social media than it is for a candidate.Read Write Web writes:
Center for American Progress, a liberal policy and advocacy group, just released an interesting memo (PDF) about the White House's use of Web 2.0. There can be little doubt that the Obama campaign skillfully used the Internet to raise funds and create and manage a grassroots organization that, in the end, carried them to the White House. Now, however, a lot of us have grown a bit restless, looking at how slowly the White House is adopting Web 2.0 tools like social networks and blogs, especially when compared to the Obama campaign. This memo, however, puts things into perspective. While the campaign team dedicated over 170 staffers to new media, the White House New Media team has fewer than 10 full-time employees.
More Government Insights
White Papers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
Reports
- Federal Data Centers: Server Virtualization
- SaaS 2011: Adoption Soars, Yet Deployment Concerns Linger
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Server Virtualization Gets Relief From Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments
The report looks at other obstacles to White House Web 2.0 adoption: In making the transition from candidacy to presidency, the Obama team's social media initiatives have "to scale from 10 million motivated supporters to 300 million Americans. While it would be great if the White House could respond to every comment on a blog individually, it would be hard to scale this with just a handful of people running whitehouse.gov (and, because this is Washington, there is already a White House Correspondence Office that is officially charged with answering letters and calls from citizens)."
Comments from the White House need to be cleared by relevant agencies, while Candidate Obama simply needed to ask an expert about, for example, North Korea, and then use that expert's opinion as a talking point. "[B]ut now, White House bloggers don't just speak for the campaign, but for America, and a talking point could have real, potentially dangerous consequences."
Learn about all the latest Enterprise 2.0 technologies at TechWeb's Enterprise 2.0 Conference, Boston, June 22-25. Join us (registration required).
Follow InformationWeek on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and FriendFeed:
Twitter:
@InformationWeek
@MitchWagner
Facebook:
InformationWeek
Mitch Wagner
LinkedIn:
InformationWeek
Mitch Wagner
FriendFeed:
InformationWeek
Mitch Wagner
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Whitepaper
In this white paper, Tripwire discusses strategies for defending cyber threats that include monitoring security status of systems throughout the enterprise, detecting threats to sensitive data, and responding to threats in real-time.
Learn More













