Commentary
Microsoft's Security Essentials: A Promising Start
I've been using the beta of Microsoft Security Essentials, (MSE) having been one of the lucky few to grab it in the first few days before Microsoft closed the beta. Here's what I think so far: It's not flashy, it's not feature-rich, and its not a replacement for enterprise-class workstation security. Because of that, it has the potential to be a great solution for consumers and small businesses.I've been using the beta of Microsoft Security Essentials, (MSE) having been one of the lucky few to grab it in the first few days before Microsoft closed the beta. Here's what I think so far: It's not flashy, it's not feature-rich, and its not a replacement for enterprise-class workstation security. Because of that, it has the potential to be a great solution for consumers and small businesses.I'm using MSE on two systems. One is a grungy and underpowered 32-bit Windows XP virtual machine that I've used to test software and investigate spyware. The other is a new dual-core 64-bit Windows 7 system with all the trimmings. Neither is stressed or bothered by MSE's resource usage, which is more than I can say about many of the commercial security suites out there. Once MSE is installed, it stays out of your way; the only sign of its presence is an unobtrusive tray icon.
Get yourself into trouble, though, and MSE will poke out its head long enough to save your bacon. I downloaded several pieces of malware from the wild, including ones from Usenet news groups; MSE detected them as soon as they were removed from their zip or rar files. Its warning dialogs were clear, and the cleanup was quick and easy.
More Windows Insights
White Papers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Five Jobs You Can Do Better with Intelligent Decision Automation
If MSE was a commercial product, it would have no chance of success. Most security software needs to be in your face to prove that it is doing its job, answering the "what have you done for me lately" question in a way that encourages users to renew the paid subscription. Even the free products like AVG need to find a way to make that model pay, so they have been doing annoying things like bundling Yahoo Toolbar with their products and popping up big windows that are little more than ads for the paid product.
Microsoft's motivation here is different, but still based on profit and just as urgent. The company needs to prove that those Apple parodies of Windows as a bumbling spyware-filled platform are way off base, and that Windows is still the best operating system. Microsoft Security Essentials has a very good chance of doing that.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
This technical brief dives deep into migration recommendations and explains how to plan thoroughly, adopt a phased approach and who to ask for help.
Read Now












