Commentary

Report Confirms Texting While Driving More Dangerous Than Drinking And Driving

The dangers of texting from behind the wheel have been documented all-too-well by recent accidents involving texters. Now, Car and Driver magazine has proven just how dangerous it is: Drunk drivers have better reaction times than those sending texts while driving.

The dangers of texting from behind the wheel have been documented all-too-well by recent accidents involving texters. Now, Car and Driver magazine has proven just how dangerous it is: Drunk drivers have better reaction times than those sending texts while driving.Kudos to the Car and Driver team for taking the time to run this battery of tests. They installed a red light inside a car which was to signal the driver when to hit the brakes. The two drivers (one in their early 20s, another in their late 30s) were given different devices to use, such as an iPhone and Samsung Alias, both of which have QWERTY keyboards.

They then ran the test with a these two people driving and paying attention to the road at 35 and 70 miles per hour. Time to break was an average of 0.54 seconds.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The metric they decided to use was how many additional feet were needed to bring the car to a complete halt.

When legally impaired with a blood alcohol level of 0.08, the drivers (young/old) added 11 and 4 feet to their total stopping distances, respectively, at 70MPH.

When reading an email, the drivers added 45 and 36 extra feet to their stopping distance.

When sending text messages, they added 9 and 70 feet to their total stopping distance.

Obviously, these distances are significant enough to cause an accident.

The urge to check incoming messages is sometimes hard to resist. The little red blinking light on a BlackBerry may represent an important email, after all. If your business has employees who must use mobile phones when in the car, be sure to set strict policies about messaging from behind the wheel.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links