Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Google Chrome OS: Not A Windows Killer

Google's announcement of Chrome OS has created a lot of excitement, and of course lots of speculation about what Microsoft will do. Here's my speculation about one thing that Microsoft won't do: Significantly change Windows any time soon.

Google's announcement of Chrome OS has created a lot of excitement, and of course lots of speculation about what Microsoft will do. Here's my speculation about one thing that Microsoft won't do: Significantly change Windows any time soon.Google says that Chrome OS is starting with a clean slate, using a minimal window manager and the Chrome browser on top of a Linux kernel. Simplicity means Chrome OS won't require a lot of resources, perform well on minimal hardware, and should be easier to secure. However, Chrome OS is also unlikely to have the broad set of features you'd find in Windows, Apple OS X, or even a complete Linux distribution like Ubuntu. The feature set is basically that of HTML5. Even the announcement describes it simply: "The software architecture is simple - Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. For application developers, the web is the platform."

Chrome OS is intended, at least initially, to find a home on netbooks. Microsoft is already offering Windows 7 Starter Edition at a very low price to OEMs, but only for low-priced netbooks. This seems anti-competive to me -- Microsoft shouldn't be able to dictate where Starter Edition is used. If they can get away with it, though, aggressive pricing for Starter Edition may be all they need to do to keep Google from gaining a foothold.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Anyway, haven't we already seen this movie? Linux was the primary OS of the early netbooks, before Microsoft brought back XP at a bargain-basement price. Now, nary a netbook runs Linux. Users seem to really want Windows so they can run their familiar Windows software. If anyone can make a Windows alternative work, though, it would be Google. The interface would be a web browser; the applications would be GMail, Google Docs, Google Chat, Google Calendar, etc.

If Google manages to redefine the "platform" as HTML5, even if it takes a decade, Microsoft will be at a big disadvantage. Microsoft can of course build great HTML5 support into Internet Explorer, but I don't see them embracing pure HTML5 as a development platform. Instead, they're more likely to push HTML developers to incorporate Microsoft's proprietary technologies like Silverlight and .NET to ensure that the company's tools and platforms will be cut in for a piece of the action. That, combined with the large number of Windows applications -- and more importantly, Windows users -- will make it tough for Google to gain a foothold.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links