Commentary

Bob Evans
Senior VP, Global CIO  

How U.S. Government Spends $200M Daily On IT

Federal CIO Vivek Kundra has shown outstanding leadership in creating easy-to-use websites that let taxpayers see how their money is being spent (or wasted) by the federal government's vast array of IT projects. But after looking at outlays for $38.6 billion in "major investments, I almost - but not quite - wished Kundra had kept some of these ugly and depressing details out of sight and therefore mercifully out of mind.

Federal CIO Vivek Kundra has shown outstanding leadership in creating easy-to-use websites that let taxpayers see how their money is being spent (or wasted) by the federal government's vast array of IT projects. But after looking at outlays for $38.6 billion in "major investments, I almost - but not quite - wished Kundra had kept some of these ugly and depressing details out of sight and therefore mercifully out of mind.It's hard to determine just where to start with the figures that have come to online light via Kundra's new initiatives, which my colleague Tom Claburn wrote about earlier today. How about largest average expenditure per IT project by cabinet department or agency? Let's start with the biggest spenders by average IT project expenditure, excluding for now the Defense Dept., Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs due to their truly mission-critical statuses.

As you peruse this list, please bear in mind that these massive numbers shown within the "Performance Dashboard" section of USAspending.gov do not represent the total budgets for these organizations; heck, they don't even represent the total IT budgets for those organizations. Rather, these figures cover only "major IT investments" from each entity.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

--Justice Dept: $125 million average expense per IT project, with 16 such projects in the pipeline --Social Security Admin.: $69.2 million average expense per IT project, with 14 such IT projects in the pipeline --State Dept.: $64.7 million average expense per IT project, with 17 such IT projects in the pipeline --Energy Dept.: $59.3 million average expense per IT project, with 27 such IT projects in the pipeline --NASA: $56.6 million average expense per IT project, with 27 such IT projects in the pipeline --Smithsonian Institution: $54.9 million average expense per IT project, with 11 such projects in the pipeline --Transportation Dept.: $50 million average expense per IT project, with 48 such projects in the pipeline

Now, call me silly, but how many of you CIOs out there are overseeing even one IT project with a price tag of $50 million? I imagine there are a few of you - not many, but a few. How many are running, say, four projects at $50 million each? And how many can imagine running 48 IT projects at $50 million each?? Yet that's exactly what's going on with the junior partner in the group above, with Transportation shelling out $2.4 billion this year alone for IT projects.

So which suppliers are taking in a lot of that money, as well as even bigger amounts from Defense, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs? The USAspending.gov website lists these five contractors as the top beneficiaries of this almost-inconceivable IT bloat for FY 2009, but it also says these numbers are just YTD -- so they will likely get bigger:

1) Lockheed Martin Corp.: $20,362,164,557 2) The Boeing Company: $14,730,265,990 3) Northrop Grumman Corporation: $8,672,131,373 4) General Dynamics Corporation: $7,794,041,496 5) Raytheon Company: $5,951,997,077

Here's one more look inside the insatiable IT beast that requires $200 million worth of feed every day: "Top 5 Assistance Recipients FY 2009 YTD." I'd love to tell you more about what that means but I wasn't able to get any more detail from the USAspending.gov home page that featured this list. I hope Kundra's team will continue to add more detail and context so everyone can understand more fully where this money is going and why. Here's the list, reproduced exactly from that home page except that I've added the italics:

TOP 5 Assistance Recipients FY 2009 YTD

1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES $18,908,037,649 2 NEW YORK STATE DEPT OF HEALTH $18,335,672,042 3 TEXAS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION $13,514,862,175 4 PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF PUBLIC WELFARE $11,168,181,944 5 LOUISIANA DEPT OF HEALTH & HOSPITALS $5,031,984,907

So - maybe the first application of this new transparency driven by federal CIO Kundra will be for CIOs in the private sector to take this type of info and show their bosses what an incredibly wonderful job they're doing in comparison to the folks at the federal government. That sure sounds like a killer app to me.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links