Commentary

Thomas Claburn
 

Google Ordered To Reveal Defamatory Blogger's Identity

Bloggers who hide behind screen names to insult people may find that online pseudonyms don't really conceal one's identity.

Bloggers who hide behind screen names to insult people may find that online pseudonyms don't really conceal one's identity.A New York state supreme court judge has ordered Google to reveal a blogger's account information to model Liskula Cohen so that she can pursue a defamation claim arising from a post last year on a Google-hosted blog.

The post at issue, titled "Skanks in NYC," was published in August 2008 though Google's Blogger service and was subsequently removed. It included pictures of Cohen in suggestive poses and referred to her using the terms "psychotic," "lying," "whoring," and "skank."


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Cohen filed her suit to force Google to reveal the blogger in January and many observers were skeptical about her chance of success.

Judge Joan Madden's decision just improved those odds. Google, which resisted providing the information to adhere to its privacy policy, has revealed the blogger's e-mail address.

Cohen, in an interview on Google Morning America, said she knew the women who used that e-mail address and dismissed her as "an irrelevant person in my life."

Cohen said she spoke to the woman on the phone and said that she forgave her. "I know who it is. I know why she did it: She doesn't have anything else to do. It's sad." She said she intended to proceed with a defamation lawsuit, but added that an apology, which has not yet been offered, might change the situation.

In the interview, Cohen's attorney, Steven Wagner, characterized the judge's decision as a signal that "the Internet is no longer a safe harbor for defamatory language."

The decision might also be seen as a signal to post defamatory speech on a blog hosted abroad by a company isn't likely to comply with U.S. court orders.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links