Topics:
Mobile
Privacy: Palm's Explanation Not Good Enough
When the flap first erupted yesterday, I received the following response from Palm: Palm takes privacy very seriously, and offers users ways to turn data collecting services on and off. Our privacy policy is like many policies in the industry and includes very detailed language about potential scenarios in which we might use a customer’s information, all toward a goal of offering a great user experience. For instance, when location based services are used, we collect their information to give them relevant local results in Google Maps. We appreciate the trust that users give us with their information, and have no intention to violate that trust.That didn't quite do it for me, so I sent a bunch of follow-up questions to Palm. I received another reply from Palm just a few moments ago. Here are the questions I asked and Palm's responses: Q: Does webOS ever send location data to Palm and/or Google (or other third-party companies) even when no location-aware apps (such as Google Maps) are used?Now I fully understand that companies like to receive feedback from their products that are actually being used by real people. It helps with customer support, fixing bugs, and can be useful for developing future products. It's one thing for that data to include what apps I am running and what happens if/when my system crashes. It's an entirely different matter when that data includes location information. Palm defends itself by saying customers agree to the terms and conditions when they initially set up their device. That's complete crap and Palm knows it. There may be such a clause in the terms and conditions, but I'll bet 99.999% of Palm Pre owners didn't bother to read them as they excitedly set-up their new phone. As far as I am concerned, users need to be warned explicitly when their location information is going to be shared with anyone or anything. Every time an application wants to access my location data, I want to be asked. This is necessary to safeguard user privacy. The Palm Pre transmits location data every day. Every day! Not just when a problem occurs, but all the time, no matter what's going on and where you are. I would never knowingly consent to such an intrusion. And that's the problem here. Just because Palm added a tidy little clause into its terms & services, doesn't mean users have become informed. Does the onus fall to the end user to carefully read those terms and conditions. Yes. But those terms and conditions are often page after page after page of legalese that is so dense most everyone skips right past the whole thing and just clicks "ACCEPT". From now on, if any device, service or network wants to know or use my location data, I demand that I be asked first -- in clear terms, on a separate page from the rest of the terms and conditions. You should demand the same thing if you value your privacy. « Privacy Regulations Bedevil Medical Social Media Efforts | Main | Mobile Phone Pipeline For A Carrier Near You » |
| Sign Up Now For InformationWeek News Alerts |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Ars Technica
Boing Boing Channel 9 Forums CRN Blogs Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs Engadget Gizmodo GrokLaw |
Lifehacker
Schneier on Security Slashdot TechCrunch Techdirt Techmeme Valleywag |