Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Snow Leopard Could Be Apple's Vista

Apple's Snow Leopard has some serious bugs. So what? Every major operating system upgrade has bugs. However, it's possible that Snow Leopard is buggier than that, that it will prove to be a lemon and a drag on the company as Vista was for Microsoft.

Apple's Snow Leopard has some serious bugs. So what? Every major operating system upgrade has bugs. However, it's possible that Snow Leopard is buggier than that, that it will prove to be a lemon and a drag on the company as Vista was for Microsoft.At least, that's what the Christian Science Monitor says, in a piece headlined, "Will Snow Leopard Be Apple's Windows Vista?"

Between the list of more than 100 Mac programs that no longer work because of the update and the rampant reports of bricked machines seemingly tied to Snow Leopard, Apple has had a rough week.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Occasional graphics issues or incompatibilities are common with new OS releases - and Apple will likely correct many of the problems in due time - but the flood of articles, blogs, and forum posts this week has some drawing comparisons between Snow Leopard and a certain infamous Windows OS.

Bugs and problems so far: Upgrading to Snow Leopard causes a boot failure resulting in the endless display of a spinning icon known as the "spinning wheel of death," although Apple and Mac enthusiasts have suggested fixes. The operating system drew mixed reviews soon after it was released. Apple used an old version of Flash in Snow Leopard, which had security flaws, and did the same thing with Java, which required a patch.

Apple enthusiast Merlin Mann, author of the 43Folders productivity blog, posted an angry rant on another blog of his, Kung Fu Grippe, about problems upgrading five computers to Snow Leopard. He also criticized Apple apologists, and wrote an imaginary dialogue with one:

"Did you know how much time and effort was put into making this OS innovative and subtly enhanced?"

"Yes. I read about that. But my apps keep crashing. Like, a lot."

"What apps, Mr. Mann?"

"Lots of them. Ones I use a lot. Almost seems like the developers of some super-popular apps were testing against a different build. It's weird."

"Reeeeeeeeallllllllly?"

"Yes. Totally. Crashy crash crash crash. It's bananas."

"Did you know how much innovation and subtle refinement this new release represents?"

"Like I say, yeah. It's fast. It's efficient. It's slightly prettier."

"Sliiiiiiiightly?"

"Yeah. Very slightly. It's fine. But a bunch of my shit is broken (on 5 machines) so now I'm blowing time trying to track down updates (on 5 machines) plus miming through all the usual dot-something kabuki of re-entering serials (on 5 machines) and re-okaying launchd preferences (on 5 machines) and re-approving firewall permissions (on 5 machines). It's a tremendous amount of hassle given that I'm mostly doing it just to stay up to date (on 5 machines)."

"Reeeeeeeeallllllllly?"

"Yes. Really."

So, is Snow Leopard a lemon, or are these simply the bug reports and complaints that surface with any new operating-system release? I'm going to say it's the latter -- that the bugs in Snow Leopard aren't a big deal (except for the unlucky few, like Merlin Mann, who got stung by the bad bugs). My reasoning: For the past 12 years, since the return of Steve Jobs, it's been a bad idea to bet against Apple. The company is on a winning streak. The overwhelming majority of Mac users will be able to upgrade to Snow Leopard easily, and the bugs experienced by a few users will be ironed out quickly.

Don't bet against Apple. Ever.

On the other hand, there really is no compelling reason why you need to upgrade to Snow Leopard right away. If you're happy with Leopard, then just sit tight and watch InformationWeek and other news sites, until we let you know that Apple has distributed the first major Snow Leopard patch, which should be pretty soon, simply because that's how Apple has handled major OS updates in the past. And then sit tight a few days more, and watch InformationWeek and other Apple news sites, to make sure the patch doesn't introduce major new bugs of its own. Then and only then, a few weeks from now, go ahead and upgrade to Snow Leopard. But make a full, bootable backup of your hard drive first, just to make sure.

Me, I upgraded to Snow Leopard Saturday. The upgrade was fast and uneventful, the way major software upgrades should be. I can't say I see much difference between it and Leopard, although there are one or two minor user interface enhancements that I like. I'm not seeing any of the performance improvements that Snow Leopard reportedly brings, probably because I'm running it on a new machine and I haven't yet tried doing anything that requires much system power.

How about you? Have you upgraded? How's it working out for you?



InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on why businesses shouldn't shrug off Google's upcoming Chrome OS. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow InformationWeek on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn:

Twitter: @InformationWeek @IWpremium @MitchWagner

Facebook: InformationWeek Mitch Wagner

LinkedIn: InformationWeek Mitch Wagner


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links