Commentary

Motorola: No Windows Mobile 6.5 For Us

The initial reviews of Microsoft's new Windows Mobile 6.5. operating system have been less than pleasant. In fact, some reviewers have gone so far as to say that Windows Mobile 6.5 stinks. With the general consensus among tech reviewers being that Windows Mobile 6.5. is a bit of a bomb, it's little wonder that Motorola said it's not interested at all.

The initial reviews of Microsoft's new Windows Mobile 6.5. operating system have been less than pleasant. In fact, some reviewers have gone so far as to say that Windows Mobile 6.5 stinks. With the general consensus among tech reviewers being that Windows Mobile 6.5. is a bit of a bomb, it's little wonder that Motorola said it's not interested at all.Ouch, this has to hurt. Kicking a man when he's down. Rubbing salt into the wounds. Mud in your eye.

Today, during a closed roundtable discussion with the press, Motorola's Christy Wyatt said that the company does not plan to support the current generation of Windows Mobile software at all. Instead, it is waiting for the next generation before it chooses to begin making Windows Mobile devices again.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

When pushed for a clarification, Wyatt indicated that Windows Mobile 6.5 is not on Motorola's road map at all.

Wow.

Motorola today said at the MOTODEV Summit that it is going to focus all of its efforts on two major smartphone platforms. One of them is definitely Android. In fact, Motorola spent much of the morning wooing Android developers in an attempt to curry their favor and convince them to design apps for Android and Motorola. Wyatt indicated that the jury is out on what other platform it will support.

Motorola has been a Windows Mobile shop for as long as I can remember. For such a prominent partner to publicly say that it is sitting out on this version if Windows Mobile is a harsh indication of just how irrelevant the current generation of software from Redmond is.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links