The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Storage Blog

Topics:   Storage

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Understanding Storage Bandwidth Performance


Posted by George Crump, Oct 9, 2009 10:06 AM

Storage bandwidth is the connectivity between servers and the storage they are attached to. When it comes to understanding storage bandwidth performance you have two challenges to deal with. The first and most obvious is can the storage get the data to the application or user fast enough? The second and less obvious is can the applications and hardware those applications run on take advantage of that bandwidth?


For most data centers we can get more than enough storage bandwidth performance. There is 8GB fibre, 10GB FCoE and 10GB Ethernet. The first step should be to make sure that the application can take advantage of that performance if you upgrade to it, if not then don't. This is one of the reasons why smaller environments are served just fine by iSCSI even on 1GB connections, for them that bandwidth is good enough.

Understanding the speed at which I/O is coming out of the server to the storage connection is key. Again as mentioned in our last entry, some of the built-in utilities with the OSs can give you this information. As the environment gets more complicated, server virtualization for example, then we suggest using tools that can give you a more accurate determination like those from Akorri, Virtual Instruments or Tek-Tools.

In addition to the application, you also need to examine the server hardware itself. Does it have the CPU power and memory size needed to get the data requests to and from the storage network? In most cases the chances are yes. If you have an application that needs high I/O you have already upgraded the server hardware.

In the case of virtualized server environments, can that storage bandwidth be channeled or better allocated? Server virtualization changes the rules. Instead of a single server accessing storage or the network through a single interface, now you have multiple servers all accessing storage simultaneously. As we discussed in our article "Why Quality of Service is Even More Important in a Virtual Environment", optimizing high bandwidth in virtual environments may be better served when priorities can be given to each virtual machine.

When it comes to I/O at the storage system most systems today have multiple connections leading up to the switch infrastructure, or in the case of clustered storage the connections to the switch infrastructure scale as more storage is added. It is important there is plenty of bandwidth to the storage controller since it is likely to receive storage requests from many servers and virtual machines simultaneously. Most storage managers overbuy on storage system bandwidth and it is typically not the primary issue in the performance loop.

The disadvantage to this is that you are often paying for bandwidth that you will never use or at least not until a future date. Ideally, you should be buying just the bandwidth you need today and then upgrading it when you need it. This is one of the deliverables of clustered storage systems like those from 3PAR, Isilon and HP's Lefthand Network’s because bandwidth can grow as you need it, providing maximum flexibility and CAPEX optimization.

Clustered storage also plays a big role in addressing the next area of performance concern, the storage controller itself, which we will discuss in our next entry.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

« Services To Keep Data Flowing On 4G Networks | Main | Vivisimo Search Engine Aims For Scalability »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. No Silver Bullet for Parallelism
  2. Think Parallel 2010, Five Years of Multicore
  3. It's All In the Strategy, It's All About the Design


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Verizon Wireless Details Android 2.1 Update For Droid
  2. Why Microsoft Is The New Apple
  3. Flop Or Not, Nexus One Headed To AT&T
  4. No Copy And Paste For Windows Phone 7


  1. Viacom Secretly Uploaded Videos, YouTube Claims
  2. Windows Phone 7 Lacks Flash Support
  3. Ericsson In Talks To Buy LG Nortel Stake
  4. Google Calendar Now Finds Best Meeting Time
  5. Google, Intel, Sony Plan Android TV Platform
  6. Amazon Launches Kindle For Mac

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007