The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Security

Topics:   Government IT : Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

U.S. Government Set To Clamp Down on P2P Networks


Posted by George Hulme, Oct 6, 2009 12:37 PM

You've probably heard the horror stories around private and confidential files being exposed via peer-to-peer network sharing. Federal lawmakers are now stepping up their efforts to keep sensitive data from inadvertently leaking to the public.


Last week, a bill (Informed P2P User Act .pdf) that would make it illegal for P2P software to cause files to be inadvertently shared over a P2P network passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

How would it be possible to stop software from doing anything inadvertently? Why with notices, of course. The bill would force developers to make it clear to users what files and directories would be made available to others, and the user of the P2P software would have to agree to file sharing.

It's been my experience that when users install software, they very often just click everything that pops up in a dialogue window - without paying much attention. As a result, I think the impact of this bill, on inadvertent file sharing, will be negligible. Still, a warning label when installing this type of software can't hurt. There are plenty of consumers who probably have no idea what they're installing when they install P2P software. At least they will have been warned that they're likely making files on their system widely available.

But when it comes to government networks, and systems that connect to government networks, there's not many reasons - for most users - to have P2P installed. That's why I agree with chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Edolphus Towns, that this type of software should be banned from the vast majority of government and contractor computers and networks. Although, exceptions can be safely made when necessary. Though his inquiry as to whether "inadequate safeguards on file sharing software such as LimeWire constitute an unfair trade practice" strikes me as way off base.

« FTC To Bloggers: Gut Check Time | Main | Amazon's Three Steps To Cloud Computing »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  2. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  3. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  2. Specs For Next Motorola Android Phone Leak
  3. Encryption Is Cloud Computing Security Savior


  1. Microsoft Bing Cashback Not Always A Bargain
  2. Google Buys Ad Start-Up Teracent
  3. Feds Launch Health IT Blog
  4. Full Nelson: Video: San Francisco Goes Open, Transparent
  5. AOL Previews Brand, Trims Workforce
  6. Physicians Question Health IT Stimulus Requirements

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007