Commentary

Jonathan Salem Baskin
 

Droid Tries Harder

Ever since Avis made it respectable for a brand to be #2, there have been many really good examples of trailing entrants into product markets that achieve success, especially in the technology world. Is Motorola's new Droid the latest example?

Ever since Avis made it respectable for a brand to be #2, there have been many really good examples of trailing entrants into product markets that achieve success, especially in the technology world. Is Motorola's new Droid the latest example?There's no way around seeing it as anything but sorta like an Apple iPhone. It's how journalists and bloggers describe the launch -- either as a specific competitor, or as a reaction to the general direction of the smart phone space, thanks to iPhone specifically -- and you can't talk about the product design or functionality without at least oblique references to what (or how) iPhone performs. Droid's advertising relies on the comparisons.

So while it has to live or die standing on its own, it's intriguing that it's all but impossible to consider it without considering its competition. I know we use comparisons to make up our minds and buy things, but does the Droid branding accentuate the "secondness" of the product vs. it being truly "different?" Would there be any way to avoid it, even if it wanted to?


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

It's certainly not a game-changer product, and there's no reason to believe that the services behind it are anything but similar from the support available for the iPhone (and, in the case of multimedia support, perhaps not as good?). For those differences that are positives, I'd guess the majority of them are incremental, just as the benefits are more nuanced than breakthrough. That's not to say that Droid isn't a totally cool and highly competitive smart phone, but rather that there are many cool entrants in that market. "Different" isn't synonymous with "better." Being a new product isn't the same thing as being "new," if you get my point?

iPhone was new. It's why its competitors all look and act like it, sort of, kind of. I'm sure I'll get comments or hatemail telling me that I'm a numbnut for not realizing that shooting more pixels or running multiple apps are accomplishments just shy of finding the lost Ark of the Covenant, but that's the navel-gazing typical to the techobsessed. Go to the Droid site and try to fathom the single most obvious breakthrough attribute that makes this smart phone as must have over all other smart phones.

From my perspective, the site works overtime to tell me that Droid tries harder.

Jonathan Salem Baskin is a global brand strategist, writes the Dim Bulb blog, and is the author of Bright Lights & Dim Bulbs.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links