Commentary

AT&T Asks Users To 'Mark The Spot'

I can't believe AT&T is taking this step. It is officially asking its customers to tell them where coverage is less than optimal with a new application for the iPhone called "Mark the Spot." As in, mark the spot where AT&T failed you.

I can't believe AT&T is taking this step. It is officially asking its customers to tell them where coverage is less than optimal with a new application for the iPhone called "Mark the Spot." As in, mark the spot where AT&T failed you.Personally, I think this is pathetic. AT&T is asking its customers to become unpaid network testers. Ridiculous. It's AT&T's responsibility to provide a working wireless network. That's what its customers pay for month in and month out.

In a new move that I can hardly believe is real, AT&T has created a new application for the iPhone called "Mark the Spot." The free application (OMG, could you imagine if AT&T charged for it?), "provides customers a means to provide feedback on network user experience to AT&T." In other words, if you have a call failure, or other network weirdness, you can use this application to tell AT&T about it.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The application lets AT&T customers report dropped balls, er, calls, failed calls, zero coverage, poor coverage or data failure for a given location (GPS coordinates included). Users can note if those issues are experienced once, seldom, often, or always. Customers can also choose to add their own comments (that's asking for trouble), and will receive an SMS to acknowledge that AT&T received the report.

On one hand, it will let AT&T know exactly where it is weakest. In theory, this might lead to network improvements in those areas. On the other, AT&T should already know this. It's AT&T's network, after all. Asking customers to provide this sort of feedback will surely let AT&T know when it fails its customers, but that it has to ask them in the first place is an even bigger failure.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links