Commentary
Pig Latin, Anyone?
Pretty stunning. Militants in Iraq have been able to intercept live video feeds from Predator drones, according to a new report. What's worse is how they did it.Pretty stunning. Militants in Iraq have been able to intercept live video feeds from Predator drones, according to a new report. What's worse is how they did it.The Wall Street Journal reported this morning that hackers found a way to watch live surveillance video streaming from the drones with a $25.95 piece of software that intercepted what, insanely, appears to have been an unencrypted -- yes, unencrypted -- link between the drone and ground command.
Luckily, militants haven't been able to actually control the drones, and the military told the Journal that there haven't been any indications that the breach ended up with any actual harm done, but this remains quite the spectacular breach (and security hole).
More Government Insights
White Papers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Reports
- Strategy: Cybersecurity: Continuous Monitoring Action Plan
- SaaS 2011: Adoption Soars, Yet Deployment Concerns Linger
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Server Virtualization Gets Relief From Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments
What's more is the apparent (I can't confirm it) arrogance of the Pentagon, which knew about the bug for more than a decade but, according to the Journal, again, "assumed local adversaries wouldn't know how to exploit it."
Wrong again. CBS reported as long ago as 2002 about someone intercepting drone video in Macedonia -- on a satellite TV, nonetheless.
The Pentagon says it's in the process of or has fixed the problem, but Wired reports that might be nowhere near the case, and that the problem might be much larger than first reported by the Journal.
It appears that almost every Air Force plane in the sky sends video via an unencrypted signal to a system named the Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver depended on for intelligence by "thousands" of troops at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This is no way to run IT at war, folks, especially with the kind of money the military has at its disposal. Over and over again, top cybersecurity officials in government -- including in the military -- have told me that adversaries are becoming more and more proficient, and there have been plenty of reports about tech-savvy terrorists and insurgents. We've encoded messages at war for centuries, so why not here? I mean, eally-ray, um-kay on-ay.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Whitepaper
In this white paper, Tripwire discusses strategies for defending cyber threats that include monitoring security status of systems throughout the enterprise, detecting threats to sensitive data, and responding to threats in real-time.
Learn More













