Commentary

John Foley
Editor, InformationWeek  

Warning Signs Preceded Cyber Attack On Google

The news of a cyber attack from within China on Google and other companies has prompted a range of reactions, including Google's decision to reassess its operations there and a rebuke from U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. But no one should be surprised by what happened. Two months earlier, a U.S. government report warned that the private sector was susceptible to this very risk.

The news of a cyber attack from within China on Google and other companies has prompted a range of reactions, including Google's decision to reassess its operations there and a rebuke from U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. But no one should be surprised by what happened. Two months earlier, a U.S. government report warned that the private sector was susceptible to this very risk.That report, titled "Report on the Capability of the People's Republic of China to Conduct Cyber Warfare and Computer Network Exploitation," should be required reading for all businesses and government agencies. It warns that a "reactive defense model" -- one practiced by many IT departments -- isn't enough to ward off what's described as a "long term, sophisticated computer network exploitation campaign" by the Chinese military.

The 88-page opus, published in October, was prepared by Northrup Grumman's Information Systems Sector for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which was created 10 years ago to monitor the national security implications of trade and economic ties between the U.S. and China.


More Government Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

At the time the report was issued, InformationWeek ran a story with the following headline, "Evidence Points To China In Cyber Attacks." To repeat, that was two months before Google experienced its own targeted attack, which was revealed by Google's chief legal officer David Drummond in a Jan. 12 blog post.

In fact, since Drummond first published that, Google has gone back and provided a link to the Northrup Grumman report. You can download it here.

The report provides a detailed overview of China's cyber warfare and cyber espionage strategy, a case study in advanced cyber intrusion, a timeline of "Chinese related" cyber events over the past 10 years, and a chronology of network exploitations against U.S. and foreign interests that were allegedly undertaken by the Chinese government or its cohorts.

Notably, the report includes examples of socially engineered e-mail and zero-day exploits as among China's methods, both of which may have come into play in the December cyber attacks on U.S. companies. In its report, Northrup Grumman writes that, while conclusive evidence is hard to come by, it has reason to believe that Chinese security services have teamed with "elite individual hackers" in some cases.

The report's authors acknowledge that details are fuzzy and hard to prove, and the Chinese government has denied involvement in the attack on Google. Even so, new reports point to China as a suspected source of cyber attacks on U.S. oil companies back in 2008.

There's also this sobering assessment from Northrup Grumman: "The skill sets needed to penetrate a network for intelligence gathering purposes in peace time are the same skills necessary to penetrate that network for offensive action during war time." As I said, the report should be required reading for senior management and IT pros in business and government alike.



Register now for Black Hat DC, the largest and the most important security conference series in the world. It happens Jan. 31-Feb. 3, 2010, in Arlington, Va. Find out more and register.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links