Commentary

Ed Hansberry
 

Microsoft To Buy Cell Phone Maker?

It has barely been a week since Microsoft formally announced Windows Phone 7 Series, the successor to current Windows Mobile devices. Even though the platform has garnered quite a bit of praise and buzz, an analyst is suggesting that it might not be enough to turn the tide and Microsoft may need to resort to buying another cell phone maker.

It has barely been a week since Microsoft formally announced Windows Phone 7 Series, the successor to current Windows Mobile devices. Even though the platform has garnered quite a bit of praise and buzz, an analyst is suggesting that it might not be enough to turn the tide and Microsoft may need to resort to buying another cell phone maker.This Reuters article suggests that Microsoft needs to by RIM or possibly Nokia to stay in the game. The reason is two-fold. First of all, Windows Mobile is on a downward trend. The Windows Phone 7 announcement won't do anything t bolster WinMo 6.5 sales. Quite the reverse in fact. Unless someone needs a new phone now, they may try and hold off until the holiday season when 7 is supposed to launch.

The second reason is Microsoft, unlike most of its competitors, doesn't make its own devices. RIM, Palm, Apple, Nokia and even Google have their own devices whereas Microsoft relies solely on partners to make phones for them.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

If Microsoft wanted to get into the phone making business, they wouldn't have to buy anything though. Google contracts out their branded Nexus phone to HTC. Microsoft doesn't actually make the Zune or XBox 360 either. If they really wanted to make their own hardware, buying HTC makes the most sense as it would be cheaper than buying either Nokia or RIM. In addition, you don't have yet another platform to deal with. Remember, Microsoft purchased Danger which makes the Sidekick. We've not seen much come from that, other than some bad publicity a few months ago when the Danger servers ate user's data.

So the real question is, does Microsoft need to buy another platform to either supplement or replace Windows Phone 7? If so, Nokia isn't the answer. That is an uninteresting platform that is no better position to compete with the iPhone than any of Microsoft's current offerings. RIM is interesting and still the darling to the enterprise customer. However, if the enterprise really interested Microsoft, WinPho 7 wouldn't have targeted the consumer so forcefully. Microsoft is likely keeping WinMo 6.5.x around for a while longer, possibly dubbing it Windows Phone Classic. I suspect that Classic will appeal to the enterprise more than 7 will if for no other reason than there are a lot of different hardware choices whereas 7 basically has the iPhone style form factor.

It makes no sense to me that Microsoft would be interested in an acquisition at this time. The right time would have been in 2008 or 2009 when WinMo was on the decline. They have now put so much effort into WinPho 7 and the release is just a few months away. We'll know in 12-18 months after launch if Microsoft needs to acquire to stay alive or not. For now, I suspect they will hold off.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links