Commentary

Charles Babcock
InformationWeek  

Fujitsu Produces Desktop Virtualization 'Zero Client' Monitor

Fujitsu, a $47 billion IT solutions provider with 175,000 employees, has teamed up with startup Pano Logic on the "zero client" approach to desktop virtualization. It will build a monitor that contains connectors to the network, the keyboard and mouse. This approach eliminates even the tiny square device that Pano normally sells.

Fujitsu, a $47 billion IT solutions provider with 175,000 employees, has teamed up with startup Pano Logic on the "zero client" approach to desktop virtualization. It will build a monitor that contains connectors to the network, the keyboard and mouse. This approach eliminates even the tiny square device that Pano normally sells.Pano Logic is a venture capital-backed, Menlo Park, Calif., company that is advocating desktop virtualization with a minimum of hardware. You need less than a thin client and you can forget about the PC, it says, as reported here March 5. As with other virtual desktop schemes, the user's desktop is created and run on a central server. Pano Logic adds an appliance attached to the central server that manages user authentication and authorization and monitors end point devices. Normally, the end point device in a Pano Logic installation is a little, three and-a-half inch square box with network connections and connectors to the mouse, keyboard and USB devices.

In the Pano/Fujitsu partnership, Fujitsu will produce a monitor that contains everything embedded in the monitor stand that used to be contained in the little box. While the monitor will contain connectors, there's still no processor, memory, operating system or device drivers. The so-called zero desktop just got a little closer to zero.


More Storage Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

When Pano Logic first came out with its end point device, it charged $300 for it. That's kind of pricey for something with no processor, no memory, etc. The box was covered in chrome, so maybe that was reason it cost as much as a well equipped thin client. Today it charges $1,895 for a five-seat starter kit, which presumably includes the vrtualization software for the server and the Pano Manager appliance device. That still leaves the charge at $379 per end user. Adding end users in any desktop virtualization approach will tend to drive down the price per user. Trying to calculate savings on desktop virtualization is enough to drive engineers back to slide rules. There's the cost of the central server and its software, an identity and access management system, the cost of storage if you store each desktop or the cost of systems to spin up thousands of desktops quickly from master images, if that's your approach. And that's before you get to any of the costs associated with what's going on at the end user's desktop.

Pano Logic is making the case that most of the expenses should be at the central server. Expenses at the end point should be minimized. So far, it's brought forth Fujitsu as an accomplice in that approach. Will other monitor makers join the pursuit of the zero client? Pano spokesmen say stay tuned, they're not at liberty to disclose other manufacturers.

"In light of the advances Pano Logic has made in simplifying desktop virtualization, many of our customers around the world are considering overhauling their IT in order to reduce cost and complexity," said Rajat Kakar, VP Clients Group, Fujitsu Technology Solutions. "By leveraging Pano Logic's technology, we can provide customers with a practical and highly effective Zero Client solution that delivers dramatic savings on roll-out…" he added in the March 2 announcement.

It's those savings that we'd like to see documented at some customer site. And is the end user experience equal to the PC-style computing that employees are accustomed to?

Join us for a virtual event on strengthening IT security's weakest link: the end user. It happens Wednesday, March 24. Find out more and register.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links