Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Is Silverlight A Dead End?

When Microsoft released Silverlight in 2007, it was widely seen as an attack on Adobe's Flash player. Silverlight has come a long way since then, adding lots of features in version 4.0 that was just released in April. One thing that it hasn't done, though, is kill Flash. If anything, the predator is now suffering from friendly fire at the hands of its own company.

When Microsoft released Silverlight in 2007, it was widely seen as an attack on Adobe's Flash player. Silverlight has come a long way since then, adding lots of features in version 4.0 that was just released in April. One thing that it hasn't done, though, is kill Flash. If anything, the predator is now suffering from friendly fire at the hands of its own company.Both Flash and Silverlight seem to be getting toasty; Flash has suffered its own trials and tribulations. A web site that has a Flash intro is now the sign of a technology-tone-deaf company, unless it's an entertainment site. Plus, both are finding themselves shut out of mainstream mobile app development; Apple banned Flash from the iPhone/iPad and Microsoft didn't even try to deliver an iPhone version of Silverlight.

Microsoft's original spin on Silverlight was that it "provides enhanced Web audio and video streaming and playback." That's still front-and-center with Silverlight 4.0, including delivery of DRM-protected content in dedicated devices. So Microsoft is certainly realistic about what people really do with Silverlight -- most of the time it's just being used as a video player. Video playback is a common use for Flash as well, but at least Flash has a decent-sized installed base of non-video-player applications.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Both Flash and Silverlight are suffering at the hands of web standards like HTML5 and Javascript. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera are continuing to deliver on standards in their releases. But the most important change since 2007 is that Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 is (finally) going all-in on web standards. That is going to kill the last reason to use Silverlight on a desktop browser. (Add to that the problem that Silverlight apps are not search-engine friendly, so your content can't be found by Google or Bing searchers.) In a world where the browser supports a tag, even the support-role of video player is threatened.

Ultimately, it seems like Silverlight is destined to become a niche product. Microsoft plans to use it for Windows Phone 7 development, so it's not going to disappear. Yet it's very unlikely that Silverlight will (or should) be used for developing Internet web sites.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links