Commentary

Daniel Dern
 

Fun With Your New Dragon

Version 11 of NaturallySpeaking re-raises the perennial question, does "easier" mean "easy"?

Version 11 of NaturallySpeaking re-raises the perennial question, does "easier" mean "easy"?With the release of Version 11 of its Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software for Windows, Nuance Communications says (that is, their press release says) that Dragon now "Delivers the Accuracy, Flexibility, and Features to Make Speaking Your Mind Easier than Ever."

The big question -- not just for this program, but for all things claiming "easier" or "better" -- is whether "easier" here also means "easy."


More SMB Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

My own experiences with version 10 of Dragon NaturallySpeaking show that what looks great and easy when somebody else does it in a video or at a trade show isn't necessarily so for the newbie, any more than a Windows user like me trying to use any MacOS. (Neither OS' user interface is 'intuitive.')

Nuance claims that the training times for Dragon to get used to a new user -- by having them speak or read text to it for several minutes -- have been dramatically reduced, from four to zero for live speaking into the microphone, and when taking input from a file made with a digital voice recorder, from fifteen minutes to four. (This takes longer than live, because of sound quality differences, according to my brief chat with Peter Mahoney, senior vice president and general manager, Dragon, Nuance.)

Many of the improvements, changes and additions to Dragon sound good, like making the help easier to find, treating keyboard corrections like spoken corrections.

The big question, to my mind, isn't whether Dragon has gotten better at learning what I'm trying to say or do. It's whether Dragon has better in terms of what the user (me, for example) has to learn, habit-wise, to use it well.

My foray last summer, with Version 10, was, to say the least, not satisfactory. Maybe, to think about paraphrasing e.e. cummings, I was thinking about it too hard. Or trying to hard. Or not reading the documentation and help enough. Or simply didn't give it enough time, even just a few more hours of attentive use. Or maybe what I wanted to be doing just wasn't match for what Dragon's good at.

It's also not clear whether voice-driven computing and text entry is a match for what I'm doing at my desktop. I'm a speedy typist, I'm used to keyboarding and trackballing, I'm on the phone a lot, and like to have the radio on the rest of the time.

On the other hand, I've got two Olympus digital voice recorders -- and expect my iPhone 4 to arrive Any Day Now (that's another story), so I'm still interested in record-and-transcribe.

Dragon's shipping me a copy of version 11 to try; I'll let you know.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links