Commentary

Paul Korzeniowski
 

Polycom Teams With McAfee To Enhance Security

Increasingly, video conferencing has emerged as a way that business professionals collaborate. Since these exchanges can often occur on the fly, security has been a concern, one that Polycom and McAfee are trying to assuage.

Increasingly, video conferencing has emerged as a way that business professionals collaborate. Since these exchanges can often occur on the fly, security has been a concern, one that Polycom and McAfee are trying to assuage.The two companies forged an alliance to develop a framework for Secure Unified Communications and Collaboration. The partners plan to incorporate McAfee's threat protection solutions, including the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator console, into Polycom UC endpoints and Intelligent Core. In addition, they are expected to align their monitoring and provisioning tools.

Currently, small and medium businesses need to cobble together security products from vendors, such as McAfee, with collaboration tools, such as those offered by Polycom. The new partnership will result in bundling of those capabilities, so deployment and ongoing maintenance could become simpler. On the flip side, businesses may already have other security tools in place, so they would not want to deploy the McAfee solution and may even find that it conflicts with those tools.


More SMB Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

During the past few months, Polycom has forged alliances with a number of vendors, including HP and Microsoft. The video conferencing vendor has been trying to expand its reach to compete with Tandberg, which was acquired by Cisco early in the year. The latest agreement enables Polycom to match one more function (security) that Cisco could bundle with its telepresence systems. Going forward, the question arises: will businesses opt for the Polycom approach, which involves several partners, or feel more comfortable purchasing video conferencing products that come from one vendor, namely Cisco?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links