Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Windows Phone 7 As Web 2.0 Pacesetter?

Possibly my perspective is collaboratively twisted, because I've been spending so much time looking into Enterprise 2.0 technologies. Probably that's why I think all the chatter about Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 is missing the point in comparing the new mobile platform to iPhone and Android. What Microsoft is doing is brilliant: they're bringing Web 2.0-ness to mobile more forcefully than any of their competitors.

Possibly my perspective is collaboratively twisted, because I've been spending so much time looking into Enterprise 2.0 technologies. Probably that's why I think all the chatter about Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 is missing the point in comparing the new mobile platform to iPhone and Android. What Microsoft is doing is brilliant: they're bringing Web 2.0-ness to mobile more forcefully than any of their competitors.In this sense, Microsoft's recently aborted Kin phone can be looked at not as an abject failure, but a false start on the road to an idea -- social media streamed through your handset -- which has lots of merit.

OK, bear with me, because I realize I'm swimming against the tide. Most of the debate surrounding Windows Phone 7 is an either/or proposition. As in, does it suck or is it the best thing this side of the iPhone? (And of course, if you favor the latter view, then you necessarily think the iPhone, or perhaps Mr. Jobs himself, is the place from which the giant sucking sound emanates.)


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Let's set these strawmen aside while I attempt to take you through the process by which I got to this "Windows Phone 7 equals Social Mobile" mindset. It began, rather vaguely, when I clicked onto Paul Thurrott's engaging, hands-on first look at Windows Phone 7. Prior to that piece, I had been prepared to dismiss Microsoft's platform as an iPhone and Android also-ran. After so many tepid mobile attempts, what could Redmond possibly have up its sleeve?

But Thurrott's piece made me sit up and take notice. Even recognizing that he's usually enthusiastic about stuff he likes, there was just a level of excitement here which I told me that something was going on here. (It reminds me of when I took a look at the Zune HD, and realized, hey, this thing is actually pretty good. But that's another story entirely.)

I also checked out the demo video Fritz Nelson shot with Aaron Woodman, Microsoft Mobile's director of consumer experience. (Scroll midway down in Fritz's article, Windows Phone 7 In Technical Preview.)

The third leg of my reviews tour was Galen Gruman's Infoworld post, Windows Phone 7: Don't bother with this disaster. (If you want some real fun, read Thurrott's rejoinder, wherein he characterizes Gruman's article as a moronic Chicken Little blog post.

Gruman's take, btw, is that Windows Phone 7 is a pale imitation of a 2007-era iPhone. I think that's possibly been superceded by the iPhone 4 being a pale imitation of a pre-2007 iPhone, but I digress. OK, so let me cut to the chase here. Somewhere along the way I ran into one of those reflexive questions you see, namely "Did anyone bother to test how it works as a PHONE?" The answer, in the case of the new Microsoft platform, is no, because the thing is still in the prototype stage. That's when it dawned on me that the phone isn't the point. (Hey, if you want to make calls, get a Blackberry.)

What is the point is the ability to carry around the stream of bits you need to access the important information of your day. For younger people, that's their AIM/Facebook/text message stream. For the older and employed among us, it's a more heterogeneous mix of emails, docs you can kinda but not completely access on your mobile platform, and contact lists and schedules so you can keep up with all those meetings you'd rather not have to dial into anyway.

If this all sounds like a big, messy mish-mash, that's because it is. We all know it is, and no one's made complete sense of it yet. But I like the fact that Microsoft appears to be taking a stab at it, and the fact that Office Apps are in the mix means they're coming at it from a perspective which might eventually make a lot of sense to enterprise users.

Click through my image gallery to get a sense for what I mean:



Click to see "Slideshow: Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 Revealed."

Leave a comment below or e-mail me directly at alex@alexwolfe.net.

Follow me on Twitter: (@awolfe58)

Like this blog? Subscribe to its RSS feed: (here)

 My videos on ( YouTube)

  LinkedIn

Alex Wolfe is editor-in-chief of InformationWeek.com.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links