Commentary

Dave Methvin
 

Intel Plus McAfee Equals ... Huh?

We all know Intel for the processors that drove Windows to its world domination, but lately the company has been having problems in downsizing its hardware technology for the red-hot mobile market. With its bid to buy McAfee, Intel seems to be trying to expand outside its core competencies. I can't see how this will turn out well.

We all know Intel for the processors that drove Windows to its world domination, but lately the company has been having problems in downsizing its hardware technology for the red-hot mobile market. With its bid to buy McAfee, Intel seems to be trying to expand outside its core competencies. I can't see how this will turn out well.McAfee is certainly one of the leaders in desktop security, but the industry has not established a great record. Basically, most of the products don't work very well when tested by independent research. On the other side, security software sometimes causes its own issues. Four months ago a McAfee update killed Windows by deleting critical system files.

What value does Intel, a component maker, bring to this partnership? Since Intel makes CPUs, some have speculated that the company will try to move some security functions into hardware. Yet it would be very difficult to do anything related to security without the cooperation and full knowledge of the operating system. No matter what features are in the chips, they only matter if the software can use them effectively.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Good security needs to be built into the operating system. Microsoft has spent the past decade retrofitting Windows so that it would have better built-in security. They've made so many improvements that widely distributed third-party software such as Adobe Reader has become a primary vector for malware. In response, Microsoft has added features such as ASLR to Windows as a defense against exploits of third-party software.

To be sure, there are some things that the security industry has done very well: push product. Just about every consumer PC sold has a major security suite installed in short-fuse mode. To prove its worth to consumers, it flashes various dialogs and icons to show that it's constantly on guard. Then comes paying time, and the suite makes the push for users to renew. Unfortunately for consumers, scamware security programs that look similar to the big name brands are using the very same pitch. How are users to know what is real and what is a scam?

The Windows ecosystem has been dealing with spread-on security since its inception, epitomized by the security market leaders. Intel's bid has already started speculation about how long it will be before someone snaps up McAfee's major competitor, Symantec. But nobody seems to be talking about how the whole PC security industry is ineffective at performing its primary duty. Intel isn't likely to help that.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links