The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

« NT 4 users speak out! | InformationWeek Windows Weblog Home | Sun and Microsoft get acquainted »


Ballmer: "I'm going to have a real issue..."
Posted on Jul 16, 2004 at 01:48 PM by John Foley

I cringed when director of Windows Server marketing Steve Andersen told me at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner conference this week that Windows Update Services was being delayed again. Not only did Steve Ballmer make a big deal about Microsoft’s plans for improved patch management at last year’s WPC, but Bill Gates did the same a few months later in an interview with me. It doesn’t reflect well on either of the company’s top two executives when the product teams miss their ship dates—not just once, but twice—on such a key deliverable. Just read the following quote from Ballmer’s 2003 keynote on what was then called Software Updates Services 2.0:

“I guarantee you that if I come back to this conference, which I will -- when I am back at this conference next year, I am going to ask people whether they've deployed Software Update Services 2.0. And if as few hands go up as went up today, I'm going to have a real issue with our product development people or with our marketing people, because, believe me, this is targeted at one of the key pain points that you and our customers have identified.”

But there was no reason for Steve Ballmer to ask partners that question at this year's conference in Toronto because it would have been irrelevant, given how far behind schedule the product has fallen. Originally planned for the first half of this year, Software Update Services 2.0, later renamed Windows Update Services, got pushed into the second half -- and now it’s slated for the first half of 2005. It might be tempting to brush off the significance of the delay because WUS is mainly a mid-market product (big companies use System Management Server for patching), but there’s also this to consider: The underlying patch technology within WUS is intended to eventually replace SMS’s patch-management engine. Microsoft’s long-term goal of unifying its patch-management infrastructure has also suffered a set back.



This post falls under this topic(s):

Or read posts on these other topics:



COMMENTS

What a greayt site. Visit also the great party poker site!

Posted by: party poker opinion at November 02, 2004, 01:42 PM

This is a public forum. CMP Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in the message center do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this forum becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: The Message Center is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Hurry Quick! There is Pandemonium on the Blackboard!
  2. Microsoft Extends Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4 Beta Period
  3. Visual Basic 10 Beta 2 Also Supports Task-Based Programming


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Mobile Round-Up: iPhone On Verizon Edition
  2. Google Earth Brings 3D Maps To Audi A8
  3. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  4. HTC Droid Eris To Get Android 2.0 Update
  5. 9 Reasons Enterprises Shouldnýt Switch To Hyper-V


  1. Taser Builds Cisco-Based Data Warehouse
  2. Top 10 Smartphone Advances Of 2009
  3. Chief Of The Year: Vivek Kundra
  4. Federal CIO Kundra Talks IT Strategy
  5. Government Technologist: Holding The Fed CIO's Feet To The Fire
  6. CIO Profiles: Mujib U. Lodhi, CIO At DC Water And Sewer Authority

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007