Home
Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer



Apple Must Settle With Samsung

Comments | Larry Seltzer, BYTE | December 20, 2012 10:10 AM

Category: Tablets, Smartphones

Apple received embarrassing news late yesterday when the US Patent and Trademark Office notified them that one of the key patents which a jury found to be "willfully infringed" by Samsung in a trial earlier this year, would be reexamined for validity. The USPTO reexamination was publicized as a notice to the court from the USPTO, owing to the relevance of the decision to the case. See the full text of the notice and order embedded at the bottom of this article.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Apple's U.S. patent 7,844,915 ("Application programming interfaces for scrolling operations"), called the 915 patent in the trial and known colloquially as the "pinch and zoom" patent, describes the touch-and-drag operations for expanding and contracting the view on the display.

Yes, it's only one patent of many Samsung was found to violate, but it was one of the clearest of claims against Samsung (as proxy for Google, who really implemented the behavior). Pinch and zoom is something ordinary people can relate to. And the invalidation of the patent would serve to dim further the mystique of Apple's reputation for innovation.

Most people hadn't ever heard of smartphones before the iPhone, except maybe for BlackBerry, but in fact other products had been doing many of the things the iPhone did for years. Windows Mobile — not Windows Phone, but a much earlier attempt at a SmartPhone OS by Microsoft — may have been an overall-terrible product, but it had touch-screen and gestures before the iPhone was released.

Now it seems that pinch and zoom may not be all that new either. The specific Apple patent claim used in the trial will be reexamined by the USPTO on two grounds: first, that it was already anticipated in an earlier patent, 7,724,242 ("Touch driven method and apparatus to integrate and display multiple image layers forming alternate depictions of same subject matter"), and as unpatentable in light of other works, including a doctoral dissertation from 1991.

It's hard to come up with something really new in computing. Often what you think you invented was probably done by IBM in the 1970's when a lot of real genius work was done, and not much of that was patented.

And this isn't isolated bad news. A couple weeks ago that other patent claims by Apple, also used in the trial, were invalid. And then a few days ago the trial judge ruled against Apple's motion to block sale of the infringing Samsung products, and did so on grounds that mitigate the claimed damages. As the patents on which the judgement is based fall, Apple's position is weakening.

Their only reasonable avenue at this point is settlement on undisclosed terms. Samsung would surely be willing to do so in a way that puts legal matters behind it. And then the companies can compete for customers based on the merits of their respective products. Maybe that's not the bright future Apple envisioned, but it's a fair one.

Pinch to Zoom Patent Invalidated

Follow Larry Seltzer and BYTE on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+:



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events