Home

Bank Attackers Restart Operation Ababil DDoS Disruptions

Comments | Mathew J. Schwartz, InformationWeek | March 06, 2013 12:25 PM


The hacktivist Muslim bank website takedown crew is back.

The Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters Tuesday announced via Pastebin that they would resume their Operation Ababil distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks this week against U.S. financial institutions.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

"During ... Operation Ababil Phase 3, like previous phases, a number of american banks will be hit by denial of service attacks three days a week, on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday during working hours," read the group's latest statement.

The al-Qassam Cyber Fighters last week issued an "Al-Qassam ultimatum", warning that unless all copies of the "Innocence of Muslims" movie that mocks the founder of Islam are removed from the Internet, it would commence a third round of bank DDoS attacks. "To warn and to show our seriousness for this, an attack string was carried out against some U.S. banks on Monday February 25, 2013 such as Bank of America, PNC, CapitalOne, Zions bank, 5/3, Unionbank, Comerica, Citizenbank, Peoples, UFCU, Patelco, and others," it said.

[ Anonymous targets Wall Street. Read Anonymous Launches Operation Wall Street, Targets CEOs. ]

This week, the group appeared to carry through with those threats. According to the Site Down website, beginning Tuesday, customers of Bank of America, Capital One, Citibank, PNC Bank, Union Bank and Wells Fargo began reporting an increased number of website disruptions.

One commenter on Site Down posted Tuesday morning, "Can not access bankofamerica.com. Web site will not load...however...I CAN connect and log in using my iPhone. Strange." Another post read: "Site STILL down. Can we get a response??? am ready to take my banking elsewhere; this is getting ridiculous." Similar bursts of customer frustration were likewise directed at the other supposedly disrupted websites.

But have the banks' sites really been disrupted? BoA spokesman Mark T. Pipitone suggested otherwise. "At this point, we've had no issues on our end," he said via email.

Another bank official, speaking on background by phone, said that while many financial services websites are being targeted with DDoS attacks, people's inability to reach the websites is likely a side effect of the DDoS attack-scrubbing services and technology that firms now have in place, as well as service providers' own defenses. In other words, when a person can't access a banking site, it may be because their network, IP address or machine is being blocked by DDoS mitigation tools.

Furthermore, with a bank such as BoA alone counting 57 million customers, it can be difficult to tell whether the number of people who haven't been able to access a particular website on a given day has altered in a statistically significant way. Looking at BoA, over the past month the Site Down website received about 13 reports per day that the site couldn't be accessed. That number increased to an average of 18 per day this week, and 52 in the past 24 hours.

Of course, the combination of DDoS attacks and DDoS defenses does seem to be keeping some customers from accessing banking websites, even though the actual sites may still be up. That speaks to the scale of the website attacks -- and thus defenses in place against them. The attacks combine multiple attack techniques with massive scale, which has included maintaining sustained packet floods peaking at 70 Gbps and 30 million packets per second.

Attend Interop Las Vegas May 6-10 and learn the emerging trends in information risk management and security. Use Priority Code MPIWK by March 22 to save an additional $200 off the early bird discount on All Access and Conference Passes. Join us in Las Vegas for access to 125+ workshops and conference classes, 300+ exhibiting companies, and the latest technology. Register today!



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events