Home
Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer



Google at War With Windows 8, Phone?

Comments | Larry Seltzer, BYTE | January 04, 2013 08:45 AM

Category: Tablets, Smartphones, Operating systems, Social Networking

The incidents of Google making things difficult for users of Windows 8 and Windows Phone keep piling up. Google seems to be afraid of Windows Phone, Windows 8 and the Microsoft services associated with them. The threat these pose to Google is serious enough that it doesn't just ignore Windows 8 and Windows Phone, but actually take active measures to make them less usable.

Update: We have learned more about the behavior of Google mobile sites in various web browsers. See additions below in context.

Update 2: We have learned that our first update was based on misinformation. More below:

  • Last month Google announced the sunset of support for a variety of interfaces to their mail and other services, including Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync (EAS). Naturally, most of the attention was paid to the implications for iPhone and iPad users, but Windows 8 and Windows Phone users have it even worse. Unless they are paying customers for Google Apps, they have effectively no way to synch calendar and contacts with Google from their standard apps, and Google has made it clear that it won't write apps for Windows 8.

    Google doesn't even implement the replacement standards it will support properly. Yes, you can connect to Google Calendar with CalDAV, but you can't invite other people to a meeting with it. Google confirmed this problem for me and said it was hard at work on it.

  • On Wednesday, Microsoft's Vice President & Deputy General Counsel Dave Heiner wrote about how Google has refused to provide Microsoft with access to metadata necessary to make a fully-featured YouTube client. Google provides a fully-featured YouTube client for iOS and Heiner implies that a quid-pro-quo exists, in that Google is the only search service offered by default on iOS. But even without such a bargain, Google's actions serve to isolate Windows users from Google services they may have been using for years.
  • Do you have a Windows Phone? You don't have a Google Maps app, and if you use Internet Explorer to go to maps.google.com you get redirected to the Google home page. I've asked Google about this and as of yet haven’t received an answer.

    [UPDATE:]I have learned, however, that the reason for this is that the mobile version of Google Maps is optimized for WebKit-based browsers. WebKit, an open source project, is the browser engine in Apple's Safari, Google's Chrome, the standard web browser in versions of Android brfore 4.0, and many other less-famous browsers. Internet Explorer and Firefox are not based on WebKit and, therefore, the mobile Google Maps site will redirect when run in them.

    Google has indicated in the past that the mobile Maps site would be less exclusive. For instance, in a blog entry from May, 2011, Google Software Engineer Alireza Ali wrote "Google Maps for mobile browsers is platform independent - you will always get a consistent experience and the latest features without needing to install any updates, no matter what phone you use. The blog does say up top that "...today we’re announcing our updated Google Maps experience for mobile browsers on Android and iOS," but the clearer statement indicates that all browsers on all phones are supported.

    UPDATE 2: In fact, Google now says that Google Maps did not redirect Firefox Mobile. Here is their complete statement:

    "We periodically test Google Maps compatibility with mobile browsers to make sure we deliver the best experience for those users.

    In our last test, IE mobile still did not offer a good maps experience with no ability to pan or zoom and perform basic map functionality. As a result, we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users to Google.com where they could at least make local searches. The Firefox mobile browser did offer a somewhat better user experience and that’s why there is no redirect for those users.

    Recent improvements to IE mobile and Google Maps now deliver a better experience and we are currently working to remove the redirect. We will continue to test Google Maps compatibility with other mobile browsers to ensure the best possible experience for users."

    Whoever it was who said that the Google Maps mobile site was redirecting non-WebKit browsers was misinformed. I will write more about this Monday morning.

  • Other Google browser-based services are available, but just barely, in Internet Explorer on Windows Phone. (I haven't tested these on Windows 8, but on the Intel versions of mobile devices at least you can use another browser like Google Chrome.) Google Calendar has a three-day view and that's it; no month, no week, no modification or addition of data at all. Google+ is a bit more usable, but far from optimized or full-featured. GMail is actually tolerable (if you really need to use it), but certainly a far cry from the level of usability you expect from a mobile device. The Windows Phone app can synch e-mail with Google using IMAP, but that doesn't cover calendar or contacts. Microsoft is certainly working on CalDAV and CardDAV support, but Google's support for those is insufficient.

As I said above, Google's level of hostility to Windows 8 and Windows Phone is striking and I have to think that they see it as a serious threat. Microsoft is trying to offer all the same services that Google does, while offering access to Google's. This is what the little guy does, and Microsoft is ironically the little guy in this market. Perhaps if they were big and dominant they'd be jerks too.

But as a consumer, I want the most access I can get on whatever device I have. For now, Microsoft is providing access to its services for Android and iOS users better than Google and Apple are providing to Microsoft services. One day, if there are enough Windows 8 and Windows Phone users, Google may have to change its tune.

Follow Larry Seltzer and BYTE on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+:



Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events