Home
BYTE Newsletter
Keep up with all the BYTE News and Reviews

Subscribe

Google Reveals Mysterious Niantic Project

Comments | Thomas Claburn, InformationWeek | November 16, 2012 09:08 AM


10 Best Business Tools In Google+
10 Best Business Tools In Google+
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Google's deliberately mysterious Niantic Project has been revealed: It's an augmented reality multiplayer game called Ingress, presently available for Android devices, with an iOS version in the works.

Google doesn't have the best track record as a producer of games: Its last game-like project, a colorful chat environment called Lively, failed. But Ingress looks more promising, thanks largely to the masterful viral marketing campaign that has been promoting the project for several months.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Indeed, the marketing for Ingress -- a slow tease of hints to build interest -- appears to have been so successful that more than 200 people who have downloaded the game from Google Play have given it a five-star review before receiving the activation code necessary to actually play it.

The game is presently in closed beta and would-be players must request an activation code from Google.

[ Learn more about LinkedIn's survey findings. Read 4 Social Factors That Drive IT Buying Decisions. ]

Ingress is the second project to emerge from Niantic Labs, a Google-backed mobile app startup run by John Hanke, VP of product, who joined Google in 2004 through its acquisition of Keyhole, the source of the technology behind Google Earth. The first project was FieldTrip, a social app that provides information to mobile users about their surroundings.

"We live in a world of abundant information and ubiquitous computing -- why not play in it?" said Hanke in an emailed statement. "For the first time, the world, not the screen, can become the basis for a mobile game -- it's a controller in the palm of your hand."

This isn't quite the first time the world has been used as the basis for a mobile game. Ingress joins a growing list of augmented reality games, which rely on real-world imagery and locations as the foundation for an entertainment framework. In Ingress, game play revolves around visiting locations to collect "exotic matter" and then traveling to different locations, or "portals," to receive further game-oriented missions. Players can join one of two teams and cooperation is essential. No points will be given for dodging traffic while phone-focused; survival is its own reward.

There is a problem with such games, however: It's often really easy to cheat, because it's easy to spoof one's location. There's an app for that -- more than one, in fact. Cheating in online multiplayer games is quite common. But beyond the hack-the-system mentality of many online gamers, there's an extra incentive to cheat in a location-based game: Traveling around the real world can be time-consuming and costly.

Location-spoofing was a problem in a remarkably similar location-based multiplayer game, Shadow Cities.

But Ville Vesterinen, co-founder and CEO of Shadow Cities maker Grey Area Labs, said in an email, "On the location spoofing issue, there are the few players who attempt location spoofing, but we have build a system to catch them if they try that in Shadow Cities. Thus, it has not been an issue for us after we built a system to see if such behavior happens and let the players know about it so they won't even try it out."

Google insists it has adequate safeguards in place to prevent location spoofing, a company spokeswoman said. Even so, expect some abuse of the system.

Ingress doesn't yet have a business model, but if the game proves to be successful, Google is planning to explore revenue opportunities with partners. The game could one day be adapted to work with Google's Project Glass -- what better way to play an augmented reality game than through augmented reality glasses?

Ingress Screenshots




Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events