Home
David F. Carr

David F. Carr



Microsoft Cracks The Code On Social Software (Finally)

Comments | David F. Carr, InformationWeek | July 19, 2012 04:22 PM


Questions About Microsoft's Acquisition of Yammer
Questions About Microsoft's Acquisition of Yammer
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Suddenly, SharePoint looks social, like it might really be competitive as social software without requiring third-party add-ons or heroic customization to avoid looking lame by comparison with other enterprise social networking products.

Don't mistake this for an in-depth product review, because I'm really going on the demos from Microsoft's launch event for the forthcoming Office 2013 suite, including SharePoint 2013. I've also enjoyed a few days' worth of experimentation with the preview release of the next edition of Microsoft Office 365, which includes hosted access to SharePoint. I'm sure we'll be hearing a lot in coming months from competitors and other critics about where the holes are, and I do see some gaps in what Microsoft is promoting as a pervasive social experience across all the Office products. InformationWeek's Paul McDougall has his doubts about whether the emphasis on cloud and touch controls will win fans for this version of Office.

[ For the productivity suite's strong points, see Microsoft Office 2013: 10 Best Features.]

However, I also see many things that Microsoft has gotten right, which could allow it to take the focus off its deficiencies as a social software player and start emphasizing its strengths.

SharePoint has always been relevant to enterprise social networking discussions because it is so widely deployed as a document and content management system that every other enterprise social networking product had to have a strategy for integrating with SharePoint. If SharePoint itself can function as an enterprise social networking hub, many CIOs would see that as a great way to simplify their lives.

SharePoint 2010 had introduced some of the building blocks of a social experience, such as user profile pages, but didn't provide a respectable social news feed unless you layered on something like NewsGator's Social Sites, an enterprise social network that works with SharePoint as its foundation. When Microsoft announced last month that it was buying Yammer for $1.2 billion, some analysts took that as a sign that Microsoft had recognized that SharePoint would never be able to keep pace with the rate of change in social software the way a cloud product like Yammer could. Because SharePoint is an enterprise infrastructure product, new releases arrive about every three years, a deliberate pace that leaves plenty of time for testing and evaluating new technology so it can be deployed with minimal disruption to existing applications.

Yet when I spoke with NewsGator CEO J.B. Holston a few weeks ago about NewsGator's strategy following the Yammer acquisition, he told me he had already decided his company needed to get out of the business of merely "gap-filling" because he knew Microsoft was about to deliver a more complete social experience. I expect that there will still be room for NewsGator to add value with social features SharePoint alone doesn't deliver--for example, its video publishing and sharing--but Holston said he plans to put more energy into developing applications for specific industries.

Informationweek.com run-of-site player, used to publish article embedded videos via DCT. The same ads will be served on this player regardless of embed location.

I think we'll see Microsoft pursuing a two-track strategy, with Yammer as social software for startups, small businesses, and enterprises that are comfortable with the cloud, but continued investment in SharePoint as a social platform for organizations with an existing SharePoint investment and those who require SharePoint features that Yammer does not include. Ideally, the two engineering teams will get friendly enough to share ideas, if not technology.



Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events