Windows 8 Consumer Preview - Your PC's Getting a Bit Touchy

Setting up Windows 8
I chose to upgrade my netbook to Windows 8, installing it over Windows 7. I kept all of my software and settings, and though Windows 8 did correctly tell me that I had to uninstall Microsoft Security Essentials (the new version of Windows 8 Defender replaces it), it found no other required actions for me to take before taking the plunge. However, as soon as it finished, things took a turn for the worse.

As soon as Windows 8 finished setting up, it persistently displayed a dialog box that said it couldn't load the Asus ACPI driver. I thought this was related to the display driver issue I had, but it stemmed instead from the Asus Hot Keys application included with the machine in Windows 7. I had to run through the legacy software still left on the system, uninstalling each app one by one until the dialog box disappeared. Once I found the offending app, I then had to restore the system to factory settings, reinstall Windows 8, and then make the display-based registry modifications and uninstall the bad ACPI app.

Most users won't have to deal with this level of grief. For one, Microsoft and Asus ought to get feedback from users and insure their products play well together. Also, again, most Windows 8 installations will be on new devices; most computer users won't upgrade to it.

Not in love with the new look
The moment I first saw Windows 8's new Start Page and Live Tiles in the Developer Preview, I immediately hated it. The thought of leaving behind my non-touch, conventional desktop experience turned my stomach. After all, it's what most of the computing world is used to, right?

Consequently, anyone using Windows 8 on a traditional PC should stick with Windows 7. The learning curve for non-power users is going to be huge--I'd say three to six months before the way Windows 8 works becomes second nature. Those who remember the frustration of moving from XP to Vista, or from Office 2003 to 2007 (when the ribbon interface was first introduced), will feel just as pained. People had a hard time getting work done because Microsoft had "moved their cheese."

But if you're already using a touch-centric device? You're in for a treat. Live Tiles provide a cool way to get information and make it easy to get to the applications you use the most. For everything else, there's a searchable program menu that makes it easy to get to installed apps. The most frustrating thing about Live Tiles is that the OS wants to make every app appear in the start screen with one, even if its not intuitive for the app to be there. It's great for apps like Mail, Weather, or Stocks, where the data changes frequently. But it doesn't make sense for Word to have a tile. One, it's going to be static; two, scrolling horizontally to the right trying to find that one static tile gets old quickly.

However, the implementation of touch into the OS is really rather elegant and intuitive (as long as you have the hardware). The OS in and of itself, for a beta, feels very polished. I haven't seen a beta offering from Microsoft that was this solid since Windows 2000.

'Flat' Metro apps

Windows 8's Metro apps are very flat and have a very non-traditional, un-desktop-Windows feeling. They cannot be windowed. They run full screen only and were developed and targeted to be run on a tablet (and not necessarily a touch-enabled PC). From a multi-tasking point of view, it's a huge step backward: no putting two windows side by side with Metro, for instance. The automatic memory management of Metro apps might also raise eyebrows.

A side note about Windows Live Essentials: Many pundits will tell you that Windows 8 Metro Apps are really the Windows 8 version of Windows Live Essentials 2011. The apps included in WLE 2011 are all of the Metro apps that Microsoft included, with the exception of Windows Live Writer, at least. If you want WLW in Windows 8, unless and until Microsoft comes out with a new version of its blogging client, you might be out of luck as Windows Live Essentials 2011 will not install under Windows 8. (I know; I've tried.) I use WLW every day, and it's my blogging client of choice, regardless of platform, but I had to install WLE 2011 under Windows 7 before I upgraded to Windows 8 in order to ensure that it was there.

Industry pundits argue that multi-tasking is a myth--that the vast majority of users lose track of all the windows they have open and the apps they have running. There's something to this: most people run multiple apps so they can copy data from one to the other, and task switching makes more sense from a system perspective (use of CPU and memory, etc.). But getting the general public to fully embrace the full-screen Metro paradigm after 25 years of not doing that is going to take a bit of doing.

From a UI and interface perspective on a traditional PC, Metro is a huge letdown. The apps are flat and two-dimensional. They have little visual appeal and they contain a great deal of white space, which many may see as wasted screen real estate. They're also still a little glitchy. To wit: I have 230 unread messages in my inbox. The Mail tile tells me I only have four unread messages instead of 230. If it's only synching the last three days of mail to my inbox, it should show a count of six notes, not four.

Dual-mode UI: Metro vs. Windows 8
When you look at Windows 8, you see two totally different interfaces: the Windows 8 desktop and Metro UI. There's a definite line in the sand that's drawn between the two interfaces and there are two camps here: the traditional computer user and the tablet user.

The big concern I have with this UI dichotomy is: does it make sense? Microsoft is definitely trying to write the "one OS to rule them all" with Windows 8. Although Metro works well with Windows Phone and on a true tablet system, switching back and forth between Metro apps and, say, Office 2010 or any other legacy Windows app can be a bit jarring. The two interfaces are so drastically different and require users to work with their hardware in completely different ways.

Also, how will software developers approach Windows 8 development? Will they develop UIs for both, or just stick to Metro? If apps are redesigned entirely for Metro, will users shy away from it and stick to versions they already own? All important questions--and all without complete answers.

Because Microsoft is, like Apple, moving to a digital delivery model for future software delivery and sales, the affect on existing software delivery models is not completely known or understood. Apple's App Store doesn't offer demos or shareware. It's clear that Apple will at some point require that all Mac software be delivered via the App Store. How Microsoft will approach third-party software delivery, especially considering Windows' large shareware and third-party software markets, is unknown at this time but will have far-reaching consequences, to say the least.

Me? I'm sticking with Windows 7
I've been using Windows 8 for a week now. It's not on my main computer, and it isn't my operating system of choice (I've switched to a Mac), and probably won't be. I'm torn over the dual user interfaces. Transitioning between the two is jarring and unnerving, yet each by itself isn't bad. Veteran Windows users will be most comfortable with the old-school desktop and traditional apps on non-tablet-based computers. Those working with touch-enabled computing devices will appreciate Windows 8's faster performance and standardized and built-in support for touch, which is miles better than WIndows 7's.

Metro Apps work great on a tablet, but on a PC they're going to be met with total rejection. On a tablet, they make sense--but their flat, one-dimensional appearance and poor use of screen real estate are still disappointing. Metro as a whole is going to take a while to get used to, and its total acceptance and adoption might take more than one release of a tablet-oriented-Windows.

Bottom line: Unless you're going to be interacting with your computing device via touch, there's no compelling reason for using or switching to Windows 8. The touch paradigm doesn't convert well to keyboard and mouse equivalents. If you're using Windows Vista or earlier and are considering an upgrade, pick Windows 7--not Windows 8--no matter how cool Microsoft's latest OS sounds.