Home
BYTE Newsletter
Keep up with all the BYTE News and Reviews

Subscribe
Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer



Google Maps Mess: Windows Phone to Regain Access

Comments | Larry Seltzer, InformationWeek | January 07, 2013 08:15 AM

Category: Tablets, Smartphones

The controversy over Google's apparently deliberate maltreatment of Windows Phone users is more of a public relations scandal than anything technical. The company can't seem to make up its mind what it has done or what to say about it. Google announced that it will remove the behavior, but it has reaped a whirlwind of scrutiny that won't subside easily.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Windows Phone users who try to browse the Google Maps mobile site get redirected to the Google home page. Based on my testing, it seems that this redirection occurs for any browser based on Microsoft's Trident browser layout engine. I tested Internet Explorer, Metro Web Browser and SurfCube 3D Browser, all based on Trident and all got redirected. Opera Mini, which uses its own Presto engine, gets through to Google Maps, as do Firefox with its Gecko engine and — of course — Google's and other WebKit-based browsers.

This was initially a small part of a column I wrote last week, but other people noticed the redirection as well and it turned into scandal of sorts. The explanation I first got from Google was that they redirected all non-WebKit browsers but, as I detailed above, this turned out to be false.

This is Google's most recent (as of Sunday afternoon) statement on the issue:

"We periodically test Google Maps compatibility with mobile browsers to make sure we deliver the best experience for those users.

In our last test, IE mobile still did not offer a good maps experience with no ability to pan or zoom and perform basic map functionality. As a result, we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users to Google.com where they could at least make local searches. The Firefox mobile browser did offer a somewhat better user experience and that's why there is no redirect for those users.

Recent improvements to IE mobile and Google Maps now deliver a better experience and we are currently working to remove the redirect. We will continue to test Google Maps compatibility with other mobile browsers to ensure the best possible experience for users."

So they are admitting they have been bouncing IE on Windows Phone specifically, and we know that really means all Trident browsers. If they are bouncing any other browsers they aren't saying and I haven't found any.

Google also insists, although not in a statement, that this redirection has been in place and that it hasn't made any changes to this behavior for a long time. They do hint at it in the statement where they say that "...we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users..." This is contradicted by multiple reports from users that it used to work in the past. I can also say that when I discovered the redirection shortly after Christmas, the redirection target was an informational site about Google mobile apps.

So not only has Google made changes to the redirection behavior recently, they have changed it very recently. And worse, the site is especially useless for Windows Phone users, so Google's claim that they redirected to the Google home page to be helpful to IE users seems particularly galling.

Combine all this with a Google blog from May, 2011 by Google Software Engineer Alireza Ali which says "Google Maps for mobile browsers is platform independent - you will always get a consistent experience and the latest features without needing to install any updates, no matter what phone you use" and Google seems to be all over the map on this.

Combine it with all the other practices I described in my column last week — the end of Calendar Sync, poor support for the CalDAV standard on which non-Google Calendar users must rely, their refusal to provide Microsoft access to YouTube metadata, and a general refusal to write apps for Windows Phone — and it's hard not to conclude that Google is intentionally giving Windows Phone users a bad experience.

Follow Larry Seltzer and BYTE on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+:



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events