Home

iOS Developer Services Improve App Testing

Comments | Jacob Lopez, BYTE | December 29, 2011 07:45 PM

Category: Smartphones

The freedom to build better apps.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Those words are emblazoned across the home page of TestFlight, a free service that makes it easier for iOS app makers to test their apps across a range of iOS devices--while bypassing Apple's limit of 100 test devices.

Though 100 could be more than enough for small developers, it's not enough for larger corporations to test their apps as thoroughly as they'd like. Given the various devices and configurations, there are a number of things that can go unaccounted for with a new app.

Still, TestFlight has its fans. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Apple requires developers to register each device ahead of time. From there, developers have to send their testers app files through email or another means and the testers have to sync the files to their phones through iTunes. This has become too much trouble for many testers and they've dropped off over time.

TestFlight has made it easier for developers to distribute their apps. Developers set up TestFlight and upload their apps for distribution. From there, testers sign up and download the app easily for testing and the developer watches for feedback and usage analytics. Apple seems willing to tolerate it. It told the WSJ that TestFlight doesn't violate the developer agreement, even if it does steer developers to a path Apple didn't intend.

Armen, site owner of iSmashPhone.com (disclosure: the writer of this article covers news for iSmashPhone), who also does consulting for app developers, knows all about the process. He calls Apple's existing setup "impossible to manage" and says that TestFlight has made it easy for developers to manage. In fact, he has turned many developers on to the service while offering consultation, and many of them, as well as their testers, seem pleased with the outcome.

Since the early days of the iPhone, we've seen hackers and developers find ways to work around restrictions on Apple's popular handset. Whether it's to use apps not allowed into the App Store or features not normally permitted by Apple, or even to unlock a device to be used on a carrier other than it was intended. Much like jailbreaking, this is just one more way that developers and users work around Apple's rules and restrictions through a legal means. It's clever and it allows developers to be more sure of the products they are distributing. The more testers there are, the less of a chance there is for error later.

Another interesting option mentioned in the report is Pieceable Software's $60-a-month service that lets developers test versions of their apps that will run in a Web browser. However, it is designed more for demos of iOS apps than for testing, and can't be considered a substitute for testing on actual iOS devices. Apple already has been granting more developers the ability to sign up as enterprise users, but that costs $299 a year as opposed to the standard $99 license. Some developers have even gone as far as to obtain a second license, and while Apple has said it's not encouraged, it doesn't violate the developer agreement. Apple has many options available to make things easier for developers, from relaxing its limit to providing services similar to TestFlight's, or perhaps just letting TestFlight do the job.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events