Home

Apple vs. Samsung Injunction Reversed On Appeal

Comments | Serdar Yegulalp, BYTE | October 11, 2012 03:00 PM

Category: Smartphones

Apple's patent fracas with Samsung was dealt a counterblow today. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the district court in California overstepped when it granted Apple's injunction against selling the Samsung Galaxy Nexus in the United States.

Apple has been fighting Samsung hard in the courts, challenging the Korean electronics maker over various alleged patent infringements as part of a general pattern of attacks against Android. Most of the reason for this particular injunction was the "604" patent, which apparently covers a unified search tool that could be anything from the search box at the top of a window to a Google search widget on a smartphone home screen.

U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh granted the injunction; she also oversaw the major patent trial that took place this year between Apple and Samsung. Samsung argued that the sales of the Nexus were too poor to constitute any real threat to Apple's iPhone business, an argument the appeals court gave a nod to in its decision: "To show irreparable harm, it is necessary to show that the infringement caused harm in the first place. Sales lost to an infringing product cannot irreparably harm a patentee if consumers buy that product for reasons other than the patented feature."

Any victory at this point is good news for Samsung. Its patent trial with Apple earlier this year ended very badly for it, with a jury agreeing with the vast majority of Apple's patent infringement claims and awarding a massive damage bill.

Apart from the Galaxy Nexus, Samsung was able to get lifted the injunction against one other device, the Galaxy Tab 10.1. On the other hand, Apple is continuing to press the attack, with many other devices--such as the Samsung Galaxy S III--newly targeted as infringing on Apple's intellectual property.

Follow Serdar Yegulalp and BYTE on Twitter and Google+:



Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events