Home

Samsung Galaxy S 4 Costlier To Make Than iPhone

Comments | Eric Zeman, InformationWeek | March 20, 2013 12:20 PM


Apple iPhone 5S: The Hot Rumors
Apple iPhone 5S: The Hot Rumors
(click image for slideshow)
The Galaxy S 4 costs Samsung about $236 to manufacture for the HSPA+ model, IHS iSuppli estimates. The company's teardown of the Galaxy S 4 reveals upgraded components and some interesting choices that make the device more costly to make than both the Galaxy S 3 and metal-clad iPhone 5.

"Among the upgrades are a larger, full high-definition display; a beefed-up Samsung processor; and a wealth of new sensors that set a record high for the number of such devices in a smartphone design," said IHS senior analyst Vincent Leung in a statement.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The Galaxy S 4's 5-inch 1080p HD screen accounts for a whopping $75 of the device's cost, versus the Galaxy S 3's screen, which cost $65. IHS iSuppli notes that the Galaxy S 4's screen gave the company some trouble.

"While many brands have released smartphone models using full-HD LCD displays, the S 4 represents the first with an AMOLED display at this resolution," said Vinita Jakhanwal, director for small and medium displays at IHS. One example is the recently announced HTC One, which has a 5-inch 1080p LCD screen. LG also uses LCDs for its smartphones, such as the Optimus G Pro, which has a 5.5-inch 1080p HD display.

[ HTC smartphone fan? Read For HTC, The One Can't Come Soon Enough. ]

"Reaching a true pixel density greater than 300 ppi has been a challenge for AMOLED display makers," continued Jakhanwal. "However, Samsung was able to enhance AMOLED display performance by implementing new technologies that also drove up the cost of the display." The Galaxy S 4's screen has 441 pixels per inch, putting it far ahead of Apple's Retina display in pixel density.

The new processor in Samsung's anticipated Android smartphone is another component that helped swell the bill of materials. The four-core engine in the Galaxy S 3 cost Samsung $17.50, but the eight-core chip in the Galaxy S 4 costs $30. Both are Exynos-branded processors made by Samsung. Samsung's home-made processor is dramatically more expensive than Qualcomm's Snapdragon chip, which costs only $20.

The interesting twist here is that the HSPA+ version of the Galaxy S 4, which is what will be sold in markets outside the U.S., costs $1 more to make than the LTE 4G version. The HSPA+ radio costs Samsung $16, but it is paired with Samsung's $30 processor for a combined radio-processor cost of $46. The LTE radio costs $25, but it is paired with Qualcomm's $20 processor for a total radio-processor cost of $45.

Sensors represent another area where Samsung's costs increased. The Galaxy S 3's sensor array totaled about $12.70 per device. The Galaxy S 4, however, adds temperature and humidity sensors, which boost the overall sensor package cost to $16.

Despite making the screen, processor and on-board storage components, Samsung parts represent only about 63% of each Galaxy S 4. The remaining 37% of components come from companies such as Intel, Broadcom, Qualcomm and others.

By comparison, the 16-GB Apple iPhone 5 costs Apple $207 to manufacture. The 64-GB version costs Apple $238.

Samsung and its carrier partners have not provided pricing information for the Galaxy S 4 yet. However, the device will likely sell in the U.S. between $199 and $399, depending on the storage configuration.

InformationWeek and Mobile Commerce World are looking for insight into the future of mobile commerce. In addition to analyzing trends and gathering insight, we also hope to provide a benchmark that various mobile commerce players can use to assess where they are compared with competitors and peers to better help them meet the needs of end users. Take our InformationWeek Mobile Commerce Survey by March 22 and be eligible to win a an iPad Mini.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

COMMENTS

Tune In to BYTE
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter RSS
Whitepapers
whitepaper
In this paper you will learn the five trends shaping the future of enterprise mobility. Learn how the rise of social media as a business application, the lurring between work and home, the emergence of new mobile devices, the demand for tech savvy employees and changing expectations of corporate IT will fundamentally change the workplace.
whitepaper
In a survey of more than 1,700 information workers (iWorkers) in North America, notebooks, desktops, and smartphones were found to be “must-have” devices, while tablets, slates, and netbooks were relegated to “nice-to-have” status, according to a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Dell and Intel.
Sponsored by: Dell
Upcoming Events