07:23 PM
Connect Directly
DarkReading Virtual Event: Re-Thinking IT Security Strategy
Nov 15, 2016
Despite enterprises spending more money annually on cybersecurity defense than ever before, the nu ...Read More>>

California Bill Would Extend Privacy Protection To E-Mail

The proposed legislation would require employers to notify employees about E-mail monitoring, in or out of the office.

The privacy protection California workers enjoy on the telephone may soon be extended to E-mail. A bill requiring employers to notify employees about monitoring inside or outside the workplace passed the state Assembly's Appropriations Committee Wednesday by a 16-5 vote. Sponsored by state Sen. Debra Bowen, the proposed legislation will soon face a vote by the full Assembly, followed by a final Senate vote.

"Just because your boss owns the computers and pays for the Internet access doesn't mean he should have the right to spy on you without telling you, any more than owning the telephone and paying the phone bill should allow him to eavesdrop on your personal phone conversations without letting you know," Bowen said in a statement. She authored similar E-mail privacy bills in 1999, 2000, and 2001, all of which were vetoed.

The new bill requires employers to provide a onetime written notice disclosing plans to monitor employees electronically and detailing the information to be tracked, whether it's E-mail content or someone's physical location. According to Forrester Research, 43% of large companies employ staff to read E-mail sent by employees.

"This is a positive development for citizens who may not be aware that the employers are monitoring their activities," says Ray Everett-Church, chief privacy officer at ePrivacy Group, a privacy issues consulting firm. He notes that while it's important for companies to be able to make sure that workers are behaving appropriately, workplace monitoring should be disclosed.

Given the fate of Bowen's three previous attempts to extend privacy protection to the electronic realm, it's not clear that the new bill will fare any better. Nonetheless, Everett-Church believes that notification of monitoring isn't harmful to business interests. "Businesses have very little to fear from this legislation," he says. "If they convince the state Legislature to reject this bill, it sends a bad message to citizens. That message is you should fear your employer."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Top IT Trends to Watch in Financial Services
IT pros at banks, investment houses, insurance companies, and other financial services organizations are focused on a range of issues, from peer-to-peer lending to cybersecurity to performance, agility, and compliance. It all matters.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on for the week of October 9, 2016. We'll be talking with the editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll