Commentary
Cloud Computing: Like The iPod For Infrastructure
It's perhaps a foregone conclusion that the speakers at the Cloud Summit Executive conference, being held Tuesday at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, Calif., would insist that cloud computing isn't just marketing hype.It's perhaps a foregone conclusion that the speakers at the Cloud Summit Executive conference, being held Tuesday at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, Calif., would insist that cloud computing isn't just marketing hype.But the belief that cloud computing represents the future of the IT industry was shared by attendees. Having hauled a chair over to a power outlet to run my laptop during the morning's sessions, I found myself sitting next to Craig Heimark, CEO of CohesiveFT, a server virtualization cloud service provider.
I asked Craig whether cloud computing was really anything more than the newest buzzword for the old ASP model. He acknowledged that the technology isn't necessarily new, but compared it with what Apple had done with the iPod.
More Insights
White Papers
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- The ABC's of Cloud Computing in the Midmarket
The iPod, as many recall, wasn't the first MP3 player. What it did was made buying online music easy.
Cloud computing, said Heimark, is like the iPod in that it makes consuming computing services easy. It's just a form of virtualization, he added.
A critical difference, Heimark observed, is that cloud computing costs less than the traditional enterprise software model.
"This stuff is truly cheaper," he said.
That means jobs will be eliminated, he added. That explains some of the resistance to cloud computing in some organizations.
While there are real issues with cloud computing, particularly in the area of reliability and security, Heimark said he expected those problems would be dealt with within two years.
Echoing the belief among many in the security industry that security is a process rather than a product, Heimark observed, "Security is not binary."
That is to say, security is about risk management rather than complete safety.
I think he's right there. Banks suffer loses from fraud and theft constantly. It's a cost of doing business. There's no reason to expect that information in the cloud, or anywhere else in a connected environment, for that matter, can be made more secure than money in a bank. Indeed, today, data and money are almost interchangeable terms.
But if cloud computing truly is cheaper, it means more money in the bank for companies to worry about losing. And that's a better sort of worry than the alternative.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows












