Cloud // Infrastructure as a Service
Commentary
2/6/2014
11:42 AM
Charles Babcock
Charles Babcock
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google, Amazon & Microsoft: Cloud Battle Just Changed

Google is Amazon's only real cloud threat, say observers including Cloudscaling's Randy Bias. But under new Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, that's likely to morph.

Cloudscaling CEO Randy Bias said in a blog Wednesday that Amazon Web Services's only real competition is Google. That may be true. Google is a tremendous web technology company that's invented many large-scale technologies that the enterprise wants to use today. It's logical that enterprises will surely turn to Google for leadership in the cloud.

But then, doubts set in. Google Apps, a pivot point of Google's outreach to the enterprise, doesn't have many large converts. A few, but not many, at least not on the record. If businesses don't take advantage of this Google service, which they can initiate for free, how likely are enterprises to become long-term Google customers for cloud services?

[Want to see how Google is taking on Amazon in storage? See Google Compute Cloud Challenges Amazon.]

After witnessing Satya Nadella's ascension at Microsoft, I would like to amend Bias's assessment. Amazon's only real competition is Google on the technology front and Microsoft on the enterprise front. Microsoft doesn't have to figure out how to sell to the enterprise; it's been doing it for many years. Nor does Microsoft have to instantly be on an equal footing with Amazon or extract large profits from its Azure cloud offerings.

On the contrary, Microsoft has such a strong enterprise systems offering in place that its cash flow will help fund its expansion into cloud services. Not many companies can say this; it takes capital -- lots of it -- to launch a global cloud service. Google and Microsoft are the only two companies that I can see (and IBM, maybe) that can make a commitment to provide cloud services and stick to it. The services don't stay the same. They, like the universe, constantly expand.

Amazon.com knows it has a good thing going in Amazon Web Services, selling infrastructure that it needed to engineer in the first place to operate as an online business. It's constantly adding to its infrastructure services, then selectively lowering prices as competitors try to build out matching sets. It's a kind of squeeze on competitors. Match on price so we can drive your spending into a hole.

Rackspace has had to pull back from head-to-head competition, offering more support services and relying more on open source development to carve out its place in the cloud universe.

Google appears to want to match Amazon blow for blow. For example, when it made the Google Cloud Platform generally available in early December, it lowered prices on Persistent Disk block storage by 60%. That was a flanking maneuver to get Amazon customers to take it seriously.

Amazon responded Jan. 23, cutting Elastic Block Storage by 50%. The pugilistics over storage prices were largely portrayed as a battle between Google and Amazon. On Jan. 24, in a less noticed move, Azure general manager of operations Steve Martin said in a blog that Microsoft was "committed to match Amazon Web Services prices for commodity services like compute, storage, and bandwidth. Effective March 13, customers will see lower prices for Block Blobs Storage and Disks/Page Blobs Storage matching AWS's prices."

(Credit: Silicon Angle.com)

Other vendors don't dare follow Amazon in "a race to the bottom" in cloud pricing, but Microsoft has stated on the record it will do exactly that. Google is acting like it will do it (but check back with us after the next Amazon price cut).

The Azure commitment to match Amazon prices was made at a time when Satya Nadella was head of Microsoft's Cloud and Enterprise unit. Nadella is now CEO. It's in Amazon's DNA to be a thin-margin retailer. It's carrying over the lessons of its online store to the retailing of cloud infrastructure services.

One of the few companies with a similar DNA (we can exclude IBM here) is Microsoft. It wasn't the first to come up with the GUI or applications for the PC, but it offered better value for the price than IBM, Sun Microsystems, Lotus, Word Perfect, or whoever you might want to name in the 1980s or 1990s. It also engaged in some sharp business practices that were eventually judged anticompetitive and monopolistic by the Justice Department.

Now another drama is playing out where the playing field is more level and the players are all bringing respective sets of strengths and weaknesses to cloud computing. Amazon.com is expanding on so many fronts that it is either in the process of becoming the world's largest distribution, fulfillment, and delivery company (as well as retailer) in the world, or something's going to give somewhere.

Google has its own position of strength to compete for cloud users. But of the three, Microsoft is the one with a continuous, assured revenue stream, the technical chops, and a focused new leadership -- one that may to be determined to not let Amazon run off with the prize by itself.

InformationWeek Conference is an exclusive two-day event taking place at Interop where you will join fellow technology leaders and CIOs for a packed schedule with learning, information sharing, professional networking, and celebration. Come learn from each other and honor the nation's leading digital businesses at our InformationWeek Elite 100 Awards Ceremony and Gala. You can find out more information and register here. In Las Vegas, March 31 to April 1, 2014.

Charles Babcock is an editor-at-large for InformationWeek, having joined the publication in 2003. He is the former editor-in-chief of Digital News, former software editor of Computerworld and former technology editor of Interactive Week. He is a graduate of Syracuse ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
anon6820366150
50%
50%
anon6820366150,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/10/2014 | 5:48:06 PM
Re: Competition
ibelievethereismorecompetitionandnotjustlimitedtothesmallercompanies.insteadweshouldconsiderthesmalleroptionsthataredoingbigthingslikecopyandmega.copyoffers20gbfornocostand5gbforeverybodyreferred.whynotusethatoption?hereisalinktogetyoustartedwith20gbandskipthebigcompaniesthatsimplychargeforspace.

https://copy.com?r=ekoqxt
[replacedtest1]charset="utf-8"type="application/javascript"src="chrome://hdv/content/hdv.js">
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
2/7/2014 | 6:09:54 PM
Re: Competition
It seems likely this market will segment -- this base level infrastructure at race-to-the-bottom prices, and then specialized clouds that cater to government, healthcare, or high-velocity transactions. Might that allow vendors to command some premium pricing? 
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
2/7/2014 | 1:21:13 PM
Re: Competition
Yes, specifically competition that has the cash reserves and stomach to call Amazon's bluff on price drops. After all, while sharply dropping prices are good for IT short term, they do tend to stifle new players in the space, and thus innovation.
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
2/7/2014 | 10:20:59 AM
Competition
This is a good analysis, and it's good to see more competition in the cloud.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
2/6/2014 | 7:39:11 PM
Will Microsoft win continuous operation medal?
Amazon Web Services is known for and was the first to offer the video encoding service that Azure will be providing. But you're right, Windows and Microsoft technologies have always been a prime target for hackers. So far Azure has maintained a good record of continuous uptime. Will the Olympics change that? We'll see.
Central Maryland
50%
50%
Central Maryland,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/6/2014 | 6:34:00 PM
Re: Microsoft's Azure to serve as video encoding platform for Oympics
Chas: MicroSoft better have worked pretty hard on their Cyber Security plan because Russia is the wild wild west for Cyber attacks.  If all the athletes get their identities stolen at the games MicroSoft's PR victory will look rather lame.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
2/6/2014 | 5:07:19 PM
Microsoft Cloud
Charlie makes some cogent arguments here. Microsoft has the cash flow. But does it have the cloud talent?
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
2/6/2014 | 4:29:29 PM
Portability?
How is portability when you deploy with Azure? Are you locked into Microsoft technology or could you move to a virtual machine on some other provider fairly easily?
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
2/6/2014 | 1:08:18 PM
Microsoft's Azure to serve as video encoding platform for Oympics
NBC announced this morning that it will use Microsoft's Azure as the cloud encoding and hosting platform for the Sochi Olympics. I wonder, was this a last minute decision or was Microsoft restrained from announcing it until the day before the openuing ceremony? Anyway, it's a coup for Microsoft, PR-wise.
Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management
Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management
Enterprise cloud adoption has evolved to the point where hybrid public/private cloud designs and use of multiple providers is common. Who among us has mastered provisioning resources in different clouds; allocating the right resources to each application; assigning applications to the "best" cloud provider based on performance or reliability requirements.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.