How can legacy systems tap into hybrid cloud services? New plug-ins extend the reach of IBM's Tivoli systems management software.
VMware Pricing Controversy: Exclusive User Research
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
IBM is extending the reach of its tried and true Tivoli systems management product into the hybrid cloud. By creating Tivoli plug-ins from its Cast Iron acquisition, legacy systems can make use of cloud services through Tivoli's added integration capabilities.
IBM's announcement Aug. 25 termed it a "new hybrid cloud solution." It might be more aptly termed a "new to Tivoli hybrid cloud solution." Existing systems management vendors have struggled to bring products oriented toward physical systems into the world's virtual machine-based cloud, an opening that VMware has sought to expand into with its growing list of virtual systems management products. CA Technologies has responded the most aggressively, with its acquisitions of Nimsoft, NetQoS, 3Tera, Oblicore, Cassatt, and Hyperformix.
IBM likewise brought cloud service integration and management capabilities in-house when it acquired Cast Iron Systems in May 2010 at an undisclosed price. Cast Iron was an appliance maker that had preconfigured connections to many enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft, Lawson, Microsoft, and various middleware systems. IBM has now attached these integration capabilities to Tivoli, said Scott Hebner, VP of marketing for Tivoli.
"Cast Iron allows our existing Tivoli clients to take a pre-configured approach to using cloud services (with enterprise applications and legacy systems), rather having to do it with custom code," Hebner said. By being able to link to applications running in Amazon Web Services EC2 or IBM Smart Cloud, Tivoli customers can make use of a hybrid architecture. They can keep legacy systems handling transactions or customer data in-house, but bring in new services rather than adding them as enterprise software projects, he said.
In particular, Tivoli Service Automation Manager and Tivoli Monitoring are enabled by the Cast Iron additions, said Hebner. Users of Tivoli monitoring will be able to see not only their on-premises workloads, but also the workloads they have sent out to the cloud or services they're extracting from a cloud.
Tivoli users are used to defining policies, quotas, and limits for workloads on premises; they'll be able to do the same for workloads sent to the public cloud. Users will get a service catalogue that applies equally to on-premises and previously invoked cloud resources, with the IT staff keeping an eye on the services utilized and their cost.
The Cast Iron additions also allow Tivoli to move a workload from the premises into the cloud through a provisioning manager, while continuing to monitor its operation, Hebner said. Existing users of Tivoli Monitoring and Tivoli Service Automation Manager will get the added capabilities, starting in the fourth quarter, with their next Tivoli update.
For new customers, IBM Tivoli Monitoring is priced at $662 per core. Tivoli Service Automation Manager is priced at $618 per RVU or the equivalent of a core operating at low volumes of data.
InformationWeek Analytics has published a report on backing up VM disk files and building a resilient infrastructure that can tolerate hardware and software failures. After all, what's the point of constructing a virtualized infrastructure without a plan to keep systems up and running in case of a glitch--or outright disaster? Download the report now. (Free registration required.)
Multicloud Infrastructure & Application ManagementEnterprise cloud adoption has evolved to the point where hybrid public/private cloud designs and use of multiple providers is common. Who among us has mastered provisioning resources in different clouds; allocating the right resources to each application; assigning applications to the "best" cloud provider based on performance or reliability requirements.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?