Cloud // Infrastructure as a Service
Commentary
2/3/2011
10:33 PM
Charles Babcock
Charles Babcock
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Windows Azure Turns One, Still Growing Up

The future of cloud computing lies with those services best able to invoke the hybrid model, where Microsoft still lags.

At the one-year mark for its Azure cloud service Feb. 1, Microsoft said it has 31,000 Azure customers, 55% more than the number listed at the mid-year mark last July. That's a respectable number, for sure, but Azure's real test is yet to come.

Microsoft should have a larger lead than it does, since the open source alternatives in cloud computing needed to designed and engineered from scratch, while Microsoft had a programmer's warehouse full of technologies to begin with. The open source options are rapidly multiplying, and enterprises are in the process of deciding how they want to build out their private clouds. As they do so, that will determine which public cloud they are most compatible with.

Microsoft is doing such a great job of backtracking on all those nasty things it once said about open source code that it's almost as much fun to watch as Larry Ellison's backtracking on all those nasty things he once said about cloud computing.

On a more solemn note, Microsoft recently pointed out how its SQL Server plays nicely with the Drupal 7 open source content management, both on premises and in the Azure cloud. It's true that it's now willing to go the extra mile to work with select open source projects.

But that still doesn't solve the problem of being compatible overall with the next big thing that the enterprise wants to build out, especially if it chooses a lot of open source to do so. The private cloud, like the public cloud, is likely to have an open source infrastructure. For the private cloud to be compatible with Azure, it will need to be based on the proprietary technologies that Azure is designed to be compatible with -- such as Visual Studio, SQL Server, and Silverlight. What if the majority of enterprises don't want to do that?

Their choices abound. They have the NASA Nebula and Rackspace OpenStack project; Eucalyptus Systems with its EC2-compatible APIs; Zend's Simple API project, which holds out the prospect of cloud interoperability; the Nimbula Director cloud operating system; WSO2; or Cloud.com's CloudStack. Don't forget the Red Hat-originated Deltacloud project inside the Apache Software Foundation's incubator, where it will quietly gather strength for a few more months, or the cloud assists that both Red Hat and Ubuntu package up with the KVM open source hypervisor.

Previous
1 of 3
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management
Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management
Enterprise cloud adoption has evolved to the point where hybrid public/private cloud designs and use of multiple providers is common. Who among us has mastered provisioning resources in different clouds; allocating the right resources to each application; assigning applications to the "best" cloud provider based on performance or reliability requirements.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 27, 2014
Who wins in cloud price wars? Short answer: not IT. Enterprises don't want bare-bones IaaS. Providers must focus on support, not undercutting rivals.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.